Background: We retrospectively compared the long-term efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens (docetaxel vs. cisplatin), total dose intensity of cisplatin (> 200 vs. ≤ 200 mg/m2) and pretreatment plasma levels of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and investigated the prognostic factors. Methods: We enrolled 214 patients diagnosed with NPC and treated with CCRT. 41 patients received weekly docetaxel and 173 weekly cisplatin. 62 received cumulative cisplatin of ≤ 200 mg/m2 and 111, > 200 mg/m2. Pretreatment levels of EBV DNA were available for 155 patients. Results: Patients receiving concurrent weekly docetaxel and cisplatin had similar 5-year rates for overall survival (OS) (p = 0.306), progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.133), distant failure-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.110), and locoregional failure-free survival (LFS) (p = 0.452). Cumulative cisplatin of > 200 mg/m2 improved the 5-year rates of PFS (p = 0.018) and DFS (p = 0.042) significantly in comparison with cumulative cisplatin of ≤ 200 mg/m2. EBV DNA levels of ≥ 1,500 copies/ml was closely associated with poor DFS (p = 0.011), PFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Weekly cisplatin was well tolerated in CCRT, during which cumulative cisplatin of > 200 mg/m2 improved PFS and DFS. The long-term efficacy of concurrent docetaxel was similar to that of concurrent cisplatin. The EBV DNA level was the most significant prognostic factor.
Masticator space involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma should be graded as medial (stage T2 disease) or lateral (stage T4 disease). This can facilitate staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and may be a suitable prognostic indicator of survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.