Background Dosages of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs are recommended to be adjusted according to renal function for patients complicated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the efficacy and safety outcomes of such renal function-based dosage adjustments are not fully elucidated. Methods We retrospectively reviewed cases of pulmonary TB susceptible to first-line drugs that were treated at Jikei University Daisan Hospital between 2005 and 2014 with standard regimens based on dosage adjustments according to renal function recommended by international guidelines. Patients were divided into four groups, those with no, mild, moderate or severe CKD. In-hospital TB-related mortality, the rate of sputum culture conversion at 2 months, the frequency of adverse events (AEs), for which at least the temporal discontinuation of the suspect drug was required for patient improvement, and the rate of regimen change due to AEs were assessed. Results In the 241 enrolled patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 143 men), fourteen patients (5.8%) died due to TB during their hospitalization. The rate of sputum culture conversion at 2 months was 78.0%. The frequency of in-hospital TB-related death and the conversion rate in the groups did not vary significantly according to CKD severity including those in the non-CKD group ( P = 0.310 and P = 0.864). Meanwhile, a total of 70 AEs were observed in 60 patients (24.9%) and the difference between the groups in the overall frequency of AEs was almost significant ( P = 0.051). Moreover, for the 154 patients with CKD, severe CKD stage was a significant risk factor for regimen change (OR = 5.92, 95% CI = 1.08–32.5, P = 0.041), as were drug-induced hepatitis and cutaneous reaction (OR = 35.6, 95% CI = 8.70–145, P < 0.001; OR = 17.4, 95% CI = 3.16–95.5, P = 0.001; respectively). Conclusions Adjusting the dosage of TB treatment for CKD patients according to the guidelines was efficient in terms of similar therapeutic outcome to that of the non-CKD group. However, AEs warrant attention to avoid regimen change in patients with severe CKD, even if the renal function-based dosage adjustment is performed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4010-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThe effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs for DIH (drug induced hepatotoxicity) during tuberculosis treatment is not clear. We evaluated the effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs by comparing the period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes between patients who were prescribed with the hepatoprotective drugs after DIH was occurred and patients who were not prescribed with the hepatoprotective drugs.MethodsDuring 2006–2010, 389 patients with active tuberculosis were included in this study. DIH was defined as elevation of peak serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of more than twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). We divided the patients into the severe (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >5 times the ULN), moderate (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >3 to ≤5 times the ULN), and mild DIH groups (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >2 to ≤3 times the ULN). We compared the average period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes between patient subgroups with and without hepatoprotective drugs (ursodeoxycholic acid: UDCA, stronger neo-minophagen C: SNMC, and glycyrrhizin).ResultsIn the severe group, there was no significant difference in the average period until the normalization between subgroups with and without hepatoprotective drugs (21.4 ± 10.8 vs 21.5 ± 11.1 days, P = 0.97). In the mild group, the period was longer in the subgroup with hepatoprotective drugs than that without hepatoprotective drugs (15.7 ± 6.2 vs 12.4 ± 7.9 days, P = 0.046).ConclusionRegardless of the severity, hepatoprotective drugs did not shorten the period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes.

BackgroundRelapse of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) may lead to poor long-term prognosis and necessitates multiple rounds of steroid treatment with potential adverse effects. The objective of this study is to identify predictive factors of COP relapse by comparing demographic and clinical variables between relapse and non-relapse groups.MethodsDuring 2008–2013, 33 COP patients were treated, of which 23 (69.7%) and 10 patients (30.3%) were assigned to the non-relapse and relapse group, respectively. From medical records, we compared the following variables at initial episode: clinical characteristics, serum parameters, chest CT scan findings, and steroid treatment.ResultsClinical characteristics, cumulative prednisone dose, and steroid treatment duration were similar between groups. In univariate analysis, alternatively, the proportion of patients with bilateral shadow pattern, traction bronchiectasis, and partial remission after steroid treatment was significantly higher in the relapse group. These differences were not significant by multivariate Cox regression analysis.ConclusionsWe identified radiographic findings, such as bilateral shadow pattern, traction bronchiectasis, and partial remission, may have possibility of predictive factors for COP relapse. Larger-scale studies are required to confirm if any are independent predictors of COP relapse.

No abstract

COVID-19, ciclesonide, randomized clinical trial, pneumoniaThe aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as gauged by pneumonia progression. This multi-center, open-label randomized trial was conducted with patients recruited from 22 hospitals across Japan. Participants were patients admitted with mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 without signs of pneumonia on chest X-rays. Asymptomatic participants were diagnosed after identification through contact tracing. Trial participants were randomized to either the ciclesonide or control arm. Participants in the treatment arm were administered 400 µg of ciclesonide three times a day over seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint was exacerbated pneumonia within seven days. Secondary outcomes were changes in clinical findings, laboratory findings, and changes over time in the amount of the viral genome. In the treatment group, 16 patients (39.0%) were classified as having exacerbated pneumonia compared to 9 (18.8%) in the control group. The risk ratio (RR) was 2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-3.75), indicating a worsening of pneumonia in the ciclesonide group. Significant differences were noted in participants with a fever on admission (RR: 2.62, 90% CI: 1.17-5.85, 95% CI: 1.00-6.82) and individuals 60 years of age or older (RR: 8.80, 90% CI: 1.76-44.06, 95% CI: 1.29-59.99). The current results indicated that ciclesonide exacerbates signs of pneumonia on images in individuals with mild or asymptomatic symptoms of COVID-19 without worsening clinical symptoms.