Objectives/Hypothesis
Compare treatment‐related quality of life (QOL) impact for early‐stage human papillomavirus–associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) patients.
Study Design
Retrospective cohort at a tertiary center.
Methods
Stage I (T0‐2/N0‐1) HPV+ OPSCC patients (n = 76) with pretreatment Karnofsky scores ≥80 reported QOL after surgery alone (n = 17, 22%), surgery with adjuvant radiation ± chemotherapy (S‐a[C]XRT) (n = 23, 30%), or definitive radiation ± chemotherapy (d[C]XRT) (n = 36, 47%) with the University of Washington QOL version 4 (UW‐QOL); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Module (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ‐HN35); University of Michigan Xerostomia, and Neck Dissection Impairment Index questionnaires (median follow‐up = 2.2 years, interquartile range = 1.0–4.2 years). Treatment adverse events and gastrostomy tube rates were assessed.
Results
Over 87% of each treatment group reported good or better overall QOL. Each group had low gastrostomy tube and treatment‐specific complication rates. S‐a(C)XRT and d(C)XRT patients had similar mean scores with wide ranges for most individual and all composite categories. S‐a(C)XRT compared to d(C)XRT patients reported significantly fewer dental problems (EORTC QLQ‐C30/HN35 means = 10.1 vs. 34.3, P = .007), worse appearance (UW‐QOL means = 72.8 vs. 82.6, P = .02), and worse coughing (EORTC QLQ‐C30/HN35 means = 31.9 vs. 15.7, P = .007). Surgery alone compared to d(C)XRT and S‐a(C)XRT patients reported significantly better salivary/taste/oral functions and less pain, financial, oral/dental, and sexual problems.
Conclusions
For early‐stage HPV+ OPSCC, patients usually achieve acceptable QOL regardless of treatment. S‐a(C)XRT and d(C)XRT patients report generally similar QOL including neck/shoulder pain/function, but with a wide range in a limited patient sample. Surgery alone should be considered, when oncologically and functionally safe, given the better associated QOL.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 130:E48–E56, 2020
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.