Background
Coronavirus Disease‐19 (COVID‐19) has high mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is vital for this population. Although the humoral response to messenger RNA vaccines was shown to be impaired in KTR, there is a lack of data regarding the antibody response to inactivated vaccines. We investigated the antibody response to two consequent doses of the inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine (CoronaVac; Sinovac Biotech, China).
Methods
A total of 118 patients from two centers were included. The levels of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin‐G antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike antigens were determined with enzyme immunoassay (DIA.PRO; Milano, Italy) before the vaccine and one month after the second dose of the vaccine. Thirty‐three patients were excluded due to antibody positivity in the serum samples obtained before vaccination.
Results
Eighty‐five patients, 47 of whom were female, with a mean age of 46 ± 12, were included in the statistical analysis. The maintenance immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (88.2%), mycophenolate (63.6%), and low‐dose steroids (95.3%) in the majority of the patients. After a median of 31 days following the second dose of the vaccine, only 16 (18.8%) patients developed an antibody response. The median (IQR) antibody level was 52.5 IU/ml (21.5–96). Age (48 vs. 38,
p
= .005) and serum creatinine levels (1.14 vs. 0.91,
p
= .04) were higher in non‐responders and were also found to be independently associated with the antibody response (odds ratio (OR): 0.93,
p
= 0.012 and 0.15,
p
= 0.045, respectively) in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
In this study, we found the antibody response to the inactivated vaccine to be considerably low (18.8%) in KTR. Increased age and impaired renal function were associated with worse antibody response. Based on the knowledge that mRNA vaccines yield better humoral responses, this special population might be considered for additional doses of mRNA vaccination.
Purpose
Subacute thyroiditis(SAT) is a destructive thyroiditis associated with viral infections. Several SAT cases associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection/vaccination were recently reported. We aimed to evaluate prospectively all cases applied to our tertiary center and their relationship with SARS-CoV-2 during 16 months of the pandemic. Cases during similar pre-pandemic period were recorded for numeric comparison.
Methods
Prospective study took place between March 2020 and July 2021. SAT was diagnosed by classical criteria. Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 and a wide respiratory viral panel (RV-PCR) were taken. Previous COVID-19 was assessed by SARS-CoV-2 IgM&IgG levels. Study group was divided into three as: CoV-SAT, patients who had or still have COVID-19, Vac-SAT, patients diagnosed within three months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and NonCoV-SAT, those not associated with COVID-19 or vaccination.
Results
Out of 64 patients, 18.8% (
n
= 12) was classified as CoV-SAT, 9.3% (
n
= 6) as Vac-SAT and 71.9% as (
n
= 46) NonCoV-SAT. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests on the diagnosis of SAT were negative in all, but two patients tested positive five days later, in second testing, performed upon clinical necessity. CoV-SAT and NonCoV-SAT groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and treatment characteristics. However, symptoms were milder and treatment was easier in Vac-SAT group (
p
= 0.006).
Conclusions
Total number of SAT cases during the pandemic period was comparable to pre-pandemic period. However, a considerable rate of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in SAT patients was established. COVID-19 presented with SAT, as the first manifestation in three cases. Vaccine-related cases developed in a shorter time period, clinical presentation was milder, and only a few required corticosteroids.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.