BackgroundA series of studies has investigated the prognostic role and clinical significance of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results were inconsistent. We aimed to clarify the prognostic role of PD-L1 and relationship between PD-L1 expression and several important clinicopathological features.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index Expanded were systematically searched. All cohort or case–control studies comparing the prognosis and clinical features between the high PD-L1 and low PD-L1 groups were included. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Begg’s test. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed.ResultsSeventeen studies including 2979 patients were eligible. The overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–1.65: P = 0.07) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 81%). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (HR: 1.22; 95% CI 0.97–1.53; P = 0.09) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 78%). The expression of PD-L1 was found to be significantly correlated with alpha-fetoprotein, hepatitis history, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Begg’s test found no significant publication bias for OS and RFS. Sensitivity analysis established the robustness of our results. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis found the region of research as a significant contributor to inter-study heterogeneity in RFS, indicating some racial differences in the prognostic role of PD-L1.ConclusionsOur study found no significant prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC patients after potential curative hepatectomy based on our included studies. The expression of PD-L1 was significantly correlated with AFP, hepatitis history, and TILs. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC warrants further investigation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-019-0738-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
BackgroundThe future liver remnant (FLR) induced by stage I associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) might be limited due to liver fibrosis/cirrhosis or incomplete liver parenchymal transection.Case presentationA 51-year-old male with hepatitis B liver fibrosis was diagnosed with a large HCC (13.5 cm × 12.5 cm × 13.8 cm). The FLR of the patient was insufficient to permit one-stage tumor resection. Therefore, the two-stage ALPPS surgery was planned. Stage I ALPPS was performed with incomplete liver parenchymal transection due to bleeding (which is why we called it Mini-ALPPS). On postoperative day (POD) 18, CT revealed that the FLR hypertrophy was poor. The FLR/standard liver volume (SLV) had only increased from 22.00% to 34.63%. Salvage transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed on POD 22 days to control possible tumor progression during the waiting period and to further facilitate FLR growth. About 16 days later, a CT reassessment of FLR revealed a 42.5% FLR/SLV. A right hepatectomy was then uneventfully performed. Although HCC recurred after 586 days, the patient survived for more than 1,920 days after stage II ALPPS.DiscussionDamage control during a difficult conventional stage I ALPPS was important. TACE during the interstage and postoperative periods of this Mini-ALPPS was safe and beneficial. A multidisciplinary based on Mini-ALPPS treatment could provide patients long-term survival; however, Mini-ALPPS should not be selected as the primary solution for such patients today, as some other minimally invasive and effective strategies are available.
Urban land expansion in Fuzhou City based on coupled cellular automata and agent-based models (CA-ABM) [J].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.