A double-copy Moloney leukemia virus-based retroviral construct containing both the NeoR gene and a mutant human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) cDNA (Ser31 mutant) was used to transduce NIH 3T3 and mouse bone marrow (BM) progenitor cells. This resulted in increased resistance of these cells to methotrexate (MTX). The transduced BM progenitor cells were returned to lethally irradiated mice. The recipients transplanted with marrow cells infected with the recombinant virus showed protection from lethal MTX toxicity as compared with mock- infected animals. Evidence for integration of the proviral DNA was obtained by amplification of proviral DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern analysis. Sequencing a portion of the PCR-amplified human DHFR cDNA showed the presence of the mutation. These studies with the human Ser31 mutant DHFR cDNA gave results comparable with those obtained with the mutant murine DHFR cDNA (Leu to Arg22) in developing MTX-resistant BM. The Ser31 mutant human DHFR cDNA is currently being tested for infection of human CD34+ human BM and peripheral blood stem cells in vitro.

Background: The aims of this study were to: (1) analyse the fluoride content of tank water; (2) determine whether the method of water collection or storage influenced fluoride content; and (3) survey participant attitudes towards water fluoridation. Methods: Plastic tubes and a questionnaire were distributed through dentists to households with water tanks in Victoria. A midstream tank water sample was collected and fluoride analysed in triplicate using ion chromatography Results: All samples (n = 123) contained negligible amounts of fluoride, with a mean fluoride concentration of <0.01 ppm (range: <0.01-0.18 ppm). No statistically significant association was found between fluoride content and variables investigated such as tank material, tank age, roof material and gutter material. Most people did not know whether their tank water contained fluoride and 40.8% preferred to have access to fluoridated water. The majority thought fluoride was safe and more than half of the respondents supported fluoridation. Fluoride content of tank water was well below the optimal levels for caries prevention. Conclusions: People who rely solely on tank water for drinking may require additional exposure to fluoride for optimal caries prevention.

No abstract

No abstract