PurposeTo explore the clinical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) based on diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) for predicting genotypes and prognostic factors of breast cancer.Materials and MethodsA total of 227 patients with breast cancer confirmed by pathology were reviewed retrospectively. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), IVIM, and DKI were performed in all patients. The corresponding ADC, true diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean diffusion rate (MD), and mean kurtosis value (MK) were measured. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy in predicting the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), the expression of antigen Ki-67, and the molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The nomogram of the combined genotype-prediction model was established based on the multivariate logistic regression model results.ResultsD* and MK values were significantly higher in the high-grade Nottingham group (NPI ≥ 3.4) than the low-grade Nottingham group (NPI < 3.4) (p < 0.01). When D* ≥ 30.95 × 10−3 mm2/s and MK ≥ 0.69, the NPI tended to be high grade (with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.712 and 0.647, respectively). The combination of D* and MK demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.734 in grading NPI with sensitivity and accuracy of 71.7% and 77.1%, respectively. Additionally, higher D*, f, and MK and lower ADC and D values were observed in the high Ki-67 than low Ki-67 expression groups (p < 0.05). The AUC of the combined model (D + D* + f + MK) was 0.755, being significantly higher than that of single parameters (Z = 2.770~3.244, p = 0.001~0.006) in distinguishing high from low Ki-67 expression. D* and f values in the Luminal A subtype were significantly lower than in other subtypes (p < 0.05). Luminal B showed decreased D value compared with other subtypes (p < 0.05). The HER-2-positive subtype demonstrated increased ADC values compared with the Luminal B subtype (p < 0.05). Luminal A/B showed significantly lower D, D*, MD, and MK than the non-Luminal subtypes (p < 0.05). The combined model (D + D* + MD + MK) showed an AUC of 0.830 in diagnosing the Luminal and non-Luminal subtypes, which is significantly higher than that of a single parameter (Z = 3.273~4.440, p < 0.01). f ≥ 54.30% [odds ratio (OR) = 1.038, p < 0.001] and MK ≥ 0.68 (OR = 24.745, p = 0.012) were found to be significant predictors of triple-negative subtypes. The combination of f and MK values demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.756, 67.5%, 77.5%, and 82.4%, respectively. Moreover, as shown in the calibration curve, strong agreements were observed between nomogram prediction probability and actual findings in the prediction of genotypes (p = 0.22, 0.74).ConclusionDWI, IVIM, and DKI, as MR diffusion imaging techniques with different mathematical models showed potential to identify the prognosis and genotype of breast cancer. In addition, the combination of these three models can improve the diagnostic efficiency and thus may contribute to opting for an appropriate therapeutic approach in clinic treatment.
Currently, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in invasive breast cancers are assessed solely on the basis of their number, whereas their spatial distribution is rarely investigated. Therefore, we evaluated TILs in 579 patients with invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST) with a focus on their spatial distributions in tumor center (TC) and invasive margin (IM). We also assessed a new factor, namely para-tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (PILs) in the para-tumor lobular area (Para). Five immunoarchitectural patterns (IPs) were observed, which were significantly associated with clinicopathological features, especially molecular subtypes, histological grades, clinical stages, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. High-TIL density (IP1/2) correlated with favorable disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC patients (p = 0.04), but opposite results were observed for luminal B subtype patients (both the lowest TIL and PIL densities (IP5) correlated with good DFS, p = 0.013). Luminal B patients with high TILs in the IM and low TILs in the TC (IP3) exhibited the worst DFS, whereas those with low TILs (similar to IP5) and high PILs (IP4) exhibited poor DFS. We also identified TIL subpopulations with significantly different IPs. Our findings suggest that IP can be a potential prognostic factor for tumor immunity in IBC.
Background Non-invasive imaging technologies for assessing axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis of breast cancer are needed in clinical practice. Purpose To explore the clinical value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) for predicting ALN metastasis of breast cancer. Material and Methods A total of 194 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer who underwent IVIM and DKI examination were reviewed retrospectively. The IVIM derived parameters of D, D*, and f and DKI-derived parameters of MD and MK were measured. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the parameters between the ALN metastasis and non-ALN metastasis groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also performed. Results The D and MD in the ALN metastasis group were significantly lower than those in the non-ALN metastasis group ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001). The D*, f, and MK were higher in the ALN metastasis group than in the non-ALN metastasis group ( P = 0.015, P = 0.014, and P = 0.001, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of D (0.768) was highest. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of both IVIM and DKI were higher than that of the conventional MRI ( P = 0.002, P = 0.048). The diagnostic efficiency of IVIM + DKI were higher than that of the IVIM or DKI alone ( P = 0.021, P = 0.004). Conclusion IVIM and DKI can be used for predicting breast cancer ALN metastasis with D as the most meaningful parameter.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.