No abstract

Rev. Pac. Basin Finan. Mark. Pol. 2015.18. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by FLINDERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on 10/12/15. For personal use only.earnings quality and idiosyncratic volatility: Hence, the lower the earnings quality, the greater the idiosyncratic volatility, and the higher the value of stock options. This study investigates whether there is a link between CEO equity compensation and earnings quality. Using a simultaneous system of equations, we find negative correlations between the two, suggesting that managers have incentives to reduce earnings quality.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether US regulatory actions around reverse mergers (RM) have exerted any spillover effects on the Chinese firms listed in China and whether Chinese firms have exhibited lower financial reporting quality than their US counterparts. Design/methodology/approach To test the possible spillover effect, this paper calculates three-day cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) and the aggregate CAAR for a series of US regulatory actions in 2010 and 2011. The study then compares the accrual quality, conditional conservatism, and information content of accruals of Chinese firms and US firms. Findings The paper documents a spillover effect of US actions around RM on Chinese stocks listed in China. Overall results do not support the perception that Chinese firms have lower financial reporting quality than their US counterparts. Research limitations/implications While this study provides evidence consistent with investors perceiving poor financial reporting quality among Chinese firms, that perception is not justified by empirical evidence. Practical implications Investors need not be overly concerned about the financial reporting quality among the Chinese firms when they make asset allocation decisions. Social implications A reality check is important given that perceptions may be outdated, biased, misleading, and costly. Originality/value This study puts the financial reporting quality of Chinese firms into perspective helping global investors assess information risk for optimal resource allocation.

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to investigate the possible role of annual report readability in accrual anomaly, shedding light on why investors fail to incorporate accruals information in a timely and unbiased manner beyond the original naive investor fixation explanation.Design/methodology/approachUsing five proxies of annual report readability and available data over 1993–2017, we investigate whether accrual overpricing is more severe when annual reports are less readable.FindingsWe find little (substantive) evidence of accrual overpricing among high (low) readability firms. The readability effects are contingent on the level of business complexity and earnings management.Research limitations/implicationsThis study extends the original naive investor fixation explanation and documents annual report complexity as a market friction in explaining the accrual anomaly, contributing to the mispricing vs risk debate and supporting the efficient market hypothesis.Practical implicationsLow readability of annual reports is a red flag to investors.Social implicationsThis study provides support for regulatory initiatives aimed at enhancing readability of corporate disclosures to address market frictions and improve market efficiency.Originality/valueAccrual anomaly has posed a challenge to the efficient market hypothesis. This study draws on and adds to the line of research indicating that annual report complexity is a friction erecting a barrier to transparency, hindering market efficiency. This study contributes to our understanding of the enigmatic accrual anomaly.