Long‐chain polyprenyl diphosphate synthases play a critical role in the formation of the prenyl side‐chain of ubiquinones, but up to date, their functions have scarcely been characterized in insects. Here, we first cloned the complementary DNAs encoding the subunits of decaprenyl diphosphate synthase (DPPS) in the vetch aphid Megoura viciae, an important agricultural pest insect. The results showed that there existed three DPPS subunits, designated as MvDPPS1, MvDPPS2a, and MvDPPS2b, with an open reading frame of 1218, 1275, and 1290 bp, and a theoretical isoelectric point of 7.91, 6.63, and 9.62, respectively. The sequences of MvDPPS1s from different aphid species were nearly identical, while the sequences of MvDPPS2a and MvDPPS2b shared only moderate sequence similarity. Phylogenetic analysis clearly separated MvDPPS2a and MvDPPS2b, indicating a functional differentiation between them. Functional coexpression analysis in Escherichia coli showed that MvDPPS1 plus MvDPPS2a and MvDPPS1 plus MvDPPS2b, respectively, catalyzed the formation of the prenyl side‐chain of the ubiquinone coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). Interestingly, MvDPPS1 plus MvDPPS2b catalyzed the formation of the prenyl side‐chain of a ubiquinone other than CoQ10. RNA interference‐mediated knockdown of MvDPPS2a imposed no significant effect on MvDPPS2b, and vice versa, suggesting no compensatory action between them. In the end, we detected the product CoQ10 in the aphid, the first identification of CoQ10 in an insect species. Taken together, we characterized two functional DPPSs in M. viciae, one of which might be multifunctional. Our study helps to understand the functional plasticity of the terpenoid backbone biosynthesis pathway in insects.

Farnesyl/geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthases (FPPS/GGPPS) as the short‐chain prenyltransferases catalyse the formation of the acyclic precursors (E)‐FPP and (E)‐GGPP for isoprenoid biosynthesis. Here, we first cloned the cDNAs encoding FPPS and GGPPS in the vetch aphid Megoura viciae (designated as MvFPPS and MvGGPPS). They had an open reading frame of 1185 and 930 bp in length, encoding 395 and 309 amino acids, with a theoretical isoelectric point of 6.52 and 6.21, respectively. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed that MvFPPS and MvGGPPS shared the conserved aspartate‐rich motifs characterized by all prenyltransferases identified to date and were clustered with their homologues in two large clades. RNA interference (RNAi) combined with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis showed that both MvFPPS and MvGGPPS were involved in the biosynthesis of alarm pheromone. Spatiotemporal expression profiling showed that the expression of MvFPPS and MvGGPPS was significantly higher in embryos than in other tissues. RNAi and GC–MS performed specifically in embryos corroborated the function of MvFPPS and MvGGPPS. In vitro, enzymatic activity assay and product analysis demonstrated that MvFPPS could catalysed the formation of (E)‐FPP using DMAPP or (E)‐GPP as the allylic cosubstrates in the presence of IPP, while MvGGPPS could only use (E)‐GPP or (E)‐FPP as cosubstrates. Functional interaction analysis using RNAi revealed that MvGGPPS exerts unidirectional functional compensation for MvFPPS. Moreover, it can regulate the biosynthesis of alarm pheromone by imposing a negative feedback regulation on MvFPPS. Our study helps to understand the molecular regulatory mechanism of terpenoid biosynthesis in the aphid.

Wolbachia can modulate the reproductive development of their hosts in multiple modes, and cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most well‐studied phenotype. The whitefly Bemisia tabaci is highly receptive to different Wolbachia strains: wCcep strain from the rice moth Corcyra cephalonica and wMel strain from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster could successfully establish and induce CI in transinfected whiteflies. Nevertheless, it is unknown what will happen when these two exogenous Wolbachia strains are co‐transinfected into a new host. Here, we artificially transinferred wCcep and wMel into the whitefly and established double‐ and singly‐transinfected B. tabaci isofemale lines. Reciprocal crossing experiments showed that wCcep and wMel induced a complex of CI phenotypes in the recipient host, including unidirectional and bidirectional CI. We next sequenced the whole genome of wCcep and performed a comparative analysis of the CI factor genes between wCcep and wMel, indicating that their cif genes were phylogenetically and structurally divergent, which can explain the crossing results. The amino acid sequence identity and structural features of Cif proteins may be useful parameters for predicting their function. Structural comparisons between CifA and CifB provide valuable clues for explaining the induction or rescue of CI observed in crossing experiments between transinfected hosts.