: Neonatal purpura fulminans is a rare, life-threatening disease caused by severe congenital deficiency of protein C (PC) because of homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the PROC gene. Mutation analysis plays a critical role in diagnosing the disorder and offering prenatal guidance. In this study, we identified a genetic defect in the PROC gene leading to neonatal purpura fulminans. The propositus had very low PC activity (4%) and PC antigen activity (5%). DNA screening of the whole PROC gene revealed two compound heterozygous mutations in exon8 (c.795_796insA) and exon9 (c.1206_1207insG). These two variations led to the compound heterozygous mutations of Gly266Argfs4 and Pro405Alafs20, which were inherited from the patient's father and mother, respectively. His older sister is heterozygous for the Gly266Argfs4 mutation. The inserted nucleotides alter the protein by introducing a stop codon at the subsequent AA position, resulting in a truncated protein compared with the wild type. We deduced that the compound heterozygous mutations are responsible for the PC deficiency, the Gly266Argfs4 mutation has been confirmed to be a novel mutation.
Background. The mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients ranges from 5% to 30%, and nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) were revealed to be related to mortality. However, few studies have discussed the causes of NRBC or compared the dynamic count among patients with underlying diseases. Aim. To explore the possible causes of NRBC in ICU patients and the dynamic trends between survival and death groups and underlying disease subgroups. Methods. A total of 177 ICU patients were retrospectively included. The possible causes of NRBC in ICU patients were discussed. The relationship between NRBC and in-hospital mortality and the dynamic trend of NRBC during hospitalization between the survival and death groups and underlying disease subgroups were compared. Results. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the NRBC-positive group were higher (23.52 ± 9.39 vs. 19.62 ± 7.59; 13.50 (9.00–17.50) vs. 8.00 (6.00–12.00)). Red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb) level, oxygen saturation (SO2), oxygenation index (OI), and serum protein level were lower in the NRBC-positive group. However, D-dimer (D-D), liver and kidney function indices, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were higher than those in the NRBC-negative group. Correlation analysis showed that NRBC count was positively correlated with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and negatively correlated with SO2 (r = 0.431, P < 0.05 ; r = 0.363, P < 0.05 ; r = −0.335, P < 0.05 ). The mortality rate in the NRBC-positive group was higher, and the median survival time was shorter than that in the NRBC-negative group (77.9% vs. 95.7%, P < 0.001 ; 15 days vs. 8.5 days, P < 0.01 ). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that NRBC was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (HR: 1.12 (1.03–1.22), P < 0.01 ). The NRBC count had different hazard ratios (HRs) for in-hospital mortality in the subgroups. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) analysis revealed that the NRBC count in the death group was higher and had a sharp upward trend before death, whereas that in the survival group was negative or stayed at a low level. The changing trend of the NRBC count was different in patients with different underlying diseases. Conclusion. The possible cause of NRBC in ICU patients was related to inflammation and hypoxia. The persistently high level and rapid upward trend of NRBC counts are risk factors for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients. The changing trend of the NRBC count varied in patients with different underlying diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.