Background: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) has been widely accepted as an effective method to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in pediatric patients. Limited studies focused on the relationship between risk factors and negative outcomes. Our study aimed to seek independent risk factors for negative outcomes and construct a prognostic nomogram to assist clinical decision-making and improve outcomes.Methods: A total of 535 patients with UPJO treated with primary LP between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Negative outcomes were defined as restenosis requiring reoperation and grade III and IV complications based on the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to select risk factors for negative outcomes after LP and developed the prediction model. The model was internally validated by the parametric bootstrapping method.Results: Among the 535 patients, 33 (6.2%) developed negative outcomes. Ten patients developed ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) restenosis and underwent secondary surgery. UPJ leakage (two cases), difficulty of urinating after the removal of the Double-J (DJ) stent (two cases), and ileus (two cases) were the most common grade IIIa complications, while distal ureteral stricture (five cases), hernia formation (three cases), and delayed wound healing around the fistula (two cases) were the most common grade IIIb complications.After univariate and multivariate logistic analyses, the patient's weight, preoperative anteroposterior pelvic diameter (APD), and difficulty of DJ stent insertion were independent risk factors for negative outcomes, and they were used to fit the prediction model. The Brier score was 0.048. The model was relatively wellcalibrated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.831 (95% CI: 0.756-0.906). Decision curve analysis illustrated good clinical utility.Conclusions: Primary LP is a safe and effective method for pediatric patients with UPJO. The patient's weight, preoperative APD, and difficulty of DJ stent insertion were independent risk factors for negative outcomes after LP. We established and validated a predictive model for negative outcomes after LP. With the help of this model, clinicians can make better decisions and improve patient outcomes.

PurposeReview the experience of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in comparison to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty (PLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP), and determine the feasibility and effectiveness of RLP for recurrent UPJO in children.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients treated with transperitoneal PLP, RLP, and ROP for UPJO from December 2015 to December 2022. The Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding variables. RLP patients were 1:4 matched with PLP and 1:3 matched with ROP. The primary outcomes were failure and post-operative complications. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system.ResultsThe study included ten patients who underwent RLP, 43 patients who underwent ROP, and 412 patients who underwent PLP. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 36 months in the RLP group, 12 to 60 months in the PLP group, and 24 to 54 months in the ROP group. In the RLP group, no failure but three post-operative complications (Clavien grade II) were observed during the follow-up. Compared with the PLP group, the older age, higher weight, larger pre-operative anteroposterior diameter (APD) and APD/cortical thickness (P/C ratio), longer operation time, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer operation time and post-operative LOS were observed in the RLP group (P < 0.05). Compared with the ROP group, the older age, higher weight, and longer post-operative LOS in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer post-operative LOS was observed in the ROP group (P < 0.05). The failure and complication rates were comparable between RLP and PLP or RLP and ROP (P > 0.05).ConclusionsOur result demonstrated that RLP performed as well as PLP except for a longer operation time. Compared with ROP, RLP has the advantages of a clearer surgical view, sufficient exposure, clearer anatomical landmark position, and minor trauma with a comparable clinical outcome. On experienced hands, RLP for recurrent UPJO after is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended ROP in select patients.

BackgroundHypospadias repair is a complex surgical procedure that involves correcting penile ventral curvature (VC) and performing urethroplasty. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for VC correction and analyse the trends in hypospadias repair at a national centre in China.MethodsProspective data collection was conducted from 2019 to 2020 for patients undergoing hypospadias repair. The effectiveness of VC correction was assessed based on the degree of VC change with different strategies. Furthermore, the choice of surgical techniques for different types of hypospadias repair was analysed.ResultsA total of 434 patients were included, with a median preoperative VC degree of 50° (35°, 70°). All patients achieved a straight penis postoperatively, with 15.2% undergoing degloving, 28.6% undergoing degloving and dorsal plication (DP), 13.1% undergoing degloving and urethral plate transection (UPT), and 43.1% undergoing degloving, UPT and DP. Degloving alone was effective in correcting VC in 57.6% of patients with VC less than 30°. In our analysis, DP after UPT resulted in a higher degree of correction (25°) compared with DP after degloving alone (20°) (p<0.001). The study identified the current trends in hypospadias repair, with tubularised incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) being the most common technique used in distal hypospadias repair (70.6% of patients) and transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty (TPIFU) being preferred for proximal hypospadias repair (63.0%).ConclusionsDegloving alone is effective for correcting VC less than 30°. The majority of patients in our centre underwent UPT, and DP after UPT yielded better results compared with DP after degloving alone. Distal hypospadias repair commonly used TIP, while TPIFU was favoured for proximal hypospadias repair.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900023055.

Background: Considering the continuing debate on the best technique to treat serve hypospadias, the reoperation frequency after Transverse Preputial Island Flap Urethroplasty (TPIFU) is lacking. In the present study, we reported our clinical outcomes of severe hypospadias treated with one-staged TPIFU and analyzed the operation frequency. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of severe hypospadias patients who underwent one-stage TPIFU from December 2018 to December 2019. A stepwise approach was used to manage the curvature. Severe hypospadias was defined as the residual curvature was > 30° after degloving. Urethroplasty complications included fistula, urethral stricture, and diverticulum. The short-term cure was identified as no complications occurring for 12 months after the date of last-time surgery. The reoperation rate and operation frequency of TPIFU were analyzed. Results: A total of 136 patients who underwent one-stage TPIFU were included in the study. The follow-up after primary urethroplasty ranged from 22 to 50 months. The median age at primary surgery was 22.5 months (range from 13 to 132 months). After primary TPIFU surgery, 53(39%) patients accepted reoperation handling with complications. Among them, 24 patients (17.6%) developed fistula, 17 patients (12.5%) developed urethral stricture and 11 patients (8.1%) developed diverticulum. After the second surgery, 5/17 patients remained fistula, 5/17 patients remained urethral stricture, and 7/17 patients remained diverticulum. Overall, 61% (85 patients) met the cured standard after the primary operation, and the two operations cure rate was 87.5% (119 patients). 91.2% (124 patients) were cured in three operations.Conclusions: The present study provides a novel perspective to evaluate the surgery technique through the surgery number to cure the patients, rather than simply comparing the complication rate. Our result demonstrated that the complication rates of primary TPIFU were relatively high, but the cure rate after two or three operations was acceptable.