Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular syndrome with an average annual incidence rate of 77 per 100,000 population in the worldwide. The diagnose algorithms for suspected PE are generally include clinical scoring assessment and plasma D-dimer evaluation, patients with high risk of PE require computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) detection for confirmation. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 1035 patients with suspected PE were recruited. All the patients were clinically received simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test, determination of plasma D-dimer level, and CTPA detection. All enrolled patients were grouped according to the CTPA results: PE patients and non-PE patients. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were constructed to determine the optimal D-dimer cutoff point value which is based on Yonden's index (YI). Results: 294 (28.4%) patients were confirmed with PE and 741(71.6%) individuals were regarded as non-PE cases by CTPA detection. Using the SGS pre-test, 829 (80.1%) patients were classified PE-unlikely (SGS ≤ 2) and 206 (19.9%) patients were PE-likely (SGS ≥ 3). Patients with D-dimer levels above 1.96 mg/L had a significant risk to suffer from PE (area under curve (AUC), 0.707; 95% CI, 0.678-0.735; p < 0.05). Meanwhile, in patients with SGS ≥ 3, the D-dimer cutoff point value moved to 2.2 mg/L (AUC, 0.644; 95% CI, 0.574-0.709; p < 0.05). Conclusion: D-dimer test in combination with SGS pre-test could improve the accuracy of PE diagnosis. Patients with D-dimer levels over 1.96 mg/L (4 times of the normal level) have a significant risk for PE. In patients with SGS ≥ 3, the D-dimer cutoff point concentration for PE risk moves to the levels of 2.2 mg/L.

BackgroundOxygen pathway limitation exists in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are two effective interventions for CTEPH, but their effects and comparison of these two interventions on the oxygen pathway are not well demonstrated.MethodsCTEPH patients with available pulmonary function test, hemodynamics, and blood gas analysis before and after the interventions were included for comparison of oxygen pathway in terms of lung ventilation, lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and oxygen extraction between these two interventions.ResultsThe change in the percentage of the predicted forced expiratory volume in the 1 s (−3.4 ± 12.7 vs. 3.8 ± 8.7%, P = 0.006) and forced vital capacity (−5.5 ± 13.0 vs. 4.2 ± 9.9%, P = 0.001) among the PEA group (n = 24) and BPA group (n = 46) were significantly different. Patients in the PEA group had a significant increase in their arterial oxygen saturation (from 92.5 ± 3.6 to 94.6 ± 2.4%, P = 0.022), while those in the BPA group had no change, which could be explained by a significant improvement in ventilation/perfusion (−0.48 ± 0.53 vs. −0.17 ± 0.41, P = 0.016). Compared with patients post-BPA, patients post-PEA were characterized by higher oxygen delivery (756.3 ± 229.1 vs. 628.8 ± 188.5 ml/min, P = 0.016) and higher oxygen extraction (203.3 ± 64.8 vs. 151.2 ± 31.9 ml/min, P = 0.001).ConclusionPartial amelioration of the oxygen pathway limitations could be achieved in CTEPH patients treated with PEA and BPA. CTEPH patients post-PEA had better performance in lung gas exchange, oxygen delivery, and extraction, while those post-BPA had better lung ventilation. Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation may assist in improving the impairment of the oxygen pathway.