Human fecal specimens, serve as important materials, are widely used in the field of microbiome research, in which inconsistent results have been a pressing issue. The possible attribute factors have been proposed including the specimen status after preservation, extracted DNA quality, library preparation protocol, and sample DNA input. In this study, quality comparisons for shotgun metagenomics sequencing were performed between 2 DNA extraction methods for fresh and freeze-thaw samples, 2 library preparation protocols, and various sample inputs. The results indicate that Mag-Bind® Universal Metagenomics Kit (OM) outperformed DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QP) with a higher DNA quantity. Controlling on library preparation protocol, OM detected on-average more genes than QP. For library construction comparison by controlling on the same DNA sample, KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KH) outperformed the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 (TP) with the higher number of detected genes number and Shannon index. No significant differences were found in taxonomy between 2 library preparation protocols using the fresh, freeze-thaw and mock community samples. No significant difference was observed between 250 and 50 ng DNA inputs for library preparation on both fresh and freeze-thaw samples. Through the preliminary study, a combined protocol is recommended for performing metagenomics studies, by using OM method plus KH protocol as well as suitable DNA quantity on either fresh or freeze-thaw samples. Our findings provide clues for potential variations from various DNA extraction methods, library protocols, and sample DNA inputs, which are critical for consistent and comprehensive profiling of the human gut microbiome.
Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are associated with the recurrence, metastasis and chemoresistance of epithelial ovarian cancer. Competing endogenous RNAs (CeRNAs) play an important role in maintenance of ovarian cancer stem cell-like cells (OCSCs) characteristics. To construct a ceRNA regulatory network for OCSCs, microarray technology and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database had been used. Human serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell line COC1 cells were treated with cisplatin and paclitaxel then maintained in stem cell conditions for 6 days to obtain CD117+/CD133+ cells (OCSCs). We identified the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs), lncRNA (DELs) and mRNA (DEGs) between OCSCs and COC1 by microarray and combined them with representative microarray profiles in GEO Database. Results: According to the combination, 28 DEMs were identified at first, and 452 DEGs were obtained combining with the predicted targets of these miRNAs and our mRNA microarray results. Up-regulated DEGs of them were significantly enriched in ‘p53 signaling pathway’, ‘FoxO signaling pathway’ and ‘MicroRNAs in cancer’, whereas down-regulated DEGs were significantly enriched in ‘Adherens junction’ and ‘Hepatitis C’ pathway. 29 transcripts of 17 lncRNAs should be the ceRNAs of 10 of these miRNAs according to bioinformatics predicted results and lncRNA microarray. Finally, we obtained ceRNA network with 10 DEMs, 21 DEGs, and 25 transcripts of 13 DELs which should play an important role in maintenance of OCSCs characteristics. LINC00665-miR-146a-5p-NRP2 should be one of ceRNA pathways of the network. The qPCR results indicated that the expression of miR-146a-5p in OCSCs was lower than that in COC1, and LINC00665 shows the opposite trend. These results were consistent with the results of microarray partially. When LINC00665 expression was up-regulated in COC1, the cell proliferation ability enhanced, apoptosis rate reduced, and the percentage of G2/M phase cells increased. Conclusions: The ceRNA network we constructed may be involved in the stem cell characteristics maintenance of OCSCs and provide directions for further OCSCs research in the future, so as to assist the development and treatment of ovarian cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.