Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab for LM from epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a phase II single-arm prospective clinical trial of EGFRm NSCLC with LM treated with osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. LM response assessment was based on the modified RANO LM radiological criteria; CNS and extra-CNS response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The primary end points included LM progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR); the secondary end points included safety and LM overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 14 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 61 years, and they were predominantly female (64%). EGFR mutations were reported in exons 19 del (n = 7) and 21 L858R (n = 7). When LM was diagnosed, 12 (85.7%) patients had clinical symptoms, 71.4% (10/14) of patients were diagnosed with LM by cytology, and five (35.7%) patients had a performance status (PS) score > 2. The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2-10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%. The safety findings in the present study were consistent with the known profile of osimertinib with bevacizumab; the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the one-year survival rate was 35.7%. Conclusions: Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC. Key pointsSignificant findings of the study: To date, there is no prospective clinical study on the treatment of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in EGFRm NSCLC with LM. What this study adds: The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2-10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%, the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the oneyear survival rate was 35.7%. Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC.
The role of thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in addition to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant polymetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well established. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs with thoracic SBRT for the treatment of this patient group. Polymetastatic NSCLC was defined as having >5 metastatic lesions. Patients with polymetastatic NSCLC harboring positive EGFR mutations after initial TKI therapy for at least 8 weeks were eligible for SBRT between August 2016and August 2019. Eligible patients were treated with thoracic SBRT, and TKIs were administered for the duration of SBRT and continued after SBRT until they were considered ineffective. The control group was treated with TKI monotherapy. Propensity score matching (ratio of 1:4) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and treatment safety were evaluated. In total, 136 patients were included in the study population. Among them, 120 patients received TKIs alone, and 16 patients received TKIs with thoracic SBRT. The baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the two cohorts after propensity score matching. The median PFS was 17.8 months in the thoracic SBRT group and 10.8 months in the control group ( P = .033). In the multivariate analysis, a Cox regression model showed that thoracic SBRT was an independent statistically significant positive predictor of improved survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.54 ( P = .046). We recorded no severe toxic effects or grade 4 to 5 toxicities. Real-world data demonstrate that thoracic SBRT significantly extends PFS in EGFR-mutant polymetastatic NSCLC patients with tolerable toxicity. Given these results, randomized studies are warranted.
Primary pleural angiosarcoma (PPA) is an extremely rare malignancy for which there is no consensus on treatment. The clinical course of PPA is usually quickly fatal, regardless of the treatment used.We summarized and evaluated a relatively large population of published PPA cases to assess prognostic factors, diagnostic approaches, treatment methods and clinical outcomes. Using the CNKI, Embase, and PubMed databases, literature published in English and Chinese from 1988 through 2020 was searched using the terms “primary pleural angiosarcoma,” “pleural angiosarcoma,” and “pleuropulmonary angiosarcoma.”A total of 43 patients with PPA were identified in retrospective case series and case reports. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 24–87 years), and the median overall survival was 4 months (range 0.1–180 months). Approximately 80% of patients died from PPA within 10 months of diagnosis, and the 2-year survival rate was approximately 4.4%. In univariate analyses, the presence of pleural effusion and hemothorax were significant predictors of decreased survival, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.7 (P = .04) and 3.3 (P = .006), respectively. Sixteen patients received no therapy, and their prognosis was worse than patients who did receive therapy (P = .019). Radiation therapy improved survival more than no radiation therapy (P = .007). Patients appeared to derive clinical benefit from chemotherapy (P = .048). However, tumor resection did not seem to provide a survival benefit (P = .051). In multivariate analysis, tumor resection, and radiation were independent, statistically significant, positive predictors of better survival, with HRs of 0.3 (P = .017) and 0.1 (P = .006), respectively. The presence of hemothorax was an independent predictor of worse prognosis (P = .006).Primary angiosarcoma of the pleura is a rare, poorly understood malignancy with a poor prognosis; hence, the clinical spectrum of PPA is not completely defined. By multivariate analysis, this retrospective study showed a survival benefit of tumor resection or radiation therapy, and the presence of hemothorax was a significant prognostic factor for poor outcomes.
Background EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is prone to leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) after Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Our previous study suggested that osimertinib plus bevacizumab was safe and effective in LM from EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab with osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with LM. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data from 27 LM patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received osimertinib with or without bevacizumab at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Next, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in an LM xenograft model using the H1975 (EGFR exon20 T790M and exon21 L858R) cell line. We examined the ability of osimertinib plus bevacizumab compared with osimertinib to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and explored the potential mechanism. Results Our retrospective study observed the improved survival of LM patients in osimertinib plus bevacizumab group. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients who received osimertinib and bevacizumab (n = 16) compared with osimertinib group (n = 11) was 18.0 months versus 13.7 months (log-rank test, p = 0.046, HR = 2.867, 95% CI 1.007–8.162). The median intracranial Progression-free Survival (iPFS) was 10.6 months versus 5.5 months (log-rank test, p = 0.037, HR = 3.401, 95% CI 1.079–10.720). In the LM xenograft model with H1975 cells, the combined treatment significantly increased the effective intracranial concentration of osimertinib, modulated the level of E-cadherin and downregulated the levels of EGFR and downstream signaling pathways including p-AKT and reduced tumor microvessel density (TMD), indicated that combined osimertinib with bevacizumab may exhibit a synergistic effect in EGFR-mutant LM model possibly by modulating the level of E-cadherin. Conclusions Our findings indicate the potential benefit of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in LM with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, and more larger sample size research are still needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.