ObjectiveAcinetobacter baumannii is one of the most important pathogenic bacteria causing nosocomial infections and has a high mortality rate. Assessment of the microbiological characteristics and risk factors on prognosis associated with A.baumannii is essential. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors of patients with A.baumannii bacteremia.Patients and MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the antibiotic resistance of pathogens based on the clinical data of A.baumannii bacteremia patients presented in a tertiary teaching hospital from 2017 to 2022. Logistic regression and decision tree identified the prognostic risk factors for patients with baumannemia. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis between MDR and Non-MDR groups. The area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to compare the predictive value of the APACHE II score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.ResultsA total of 110 patients with positive A. Baumannii blood cultures were included. Most of the patients were from intensive care unit (ICU) wards. The drug sensitivity results showed that the resistance rate of A. baumannii to colistin was the lowest (1.1%), followed by tigecycline (3.6%).The survival time of MDR group was significantly shorter than that of Non-MDR group. Multivariate analysis showed that, APACHE II score and SOFA score were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of 28 days of A.baumannii bacteremia. And both scores displayed excellent AUROCs (SOFA: 0.909, APACHE II: 0.895 in predicting 28-day mortality). The two scoring systems were highly correlated and predicted no significant difference (r2 = 0.4410, P < 0.001). We found that SOFA > 7 and APACHE II > 21 are associated with significantly higher mortality rates.ConclusionA.baumannii bacteremia have the highest incidence in the ICU, with high drug resistance and mortality rates. The survival time of patients with MDR A. Baumannii bacteremia was significantly shortened. The SOFA score and APACHE II score can reflect the severity of A.baumannii bacteremia patients and evaluate the 28-day prognosis. In addition, for the convenience of calculation, the SOFA score may be more clinically useful than the APACHE II score in predicting the mortality rate of A.baumannii bacteremia.

BackgroundThe maintenance of blood pressure is pivotal in preventing sepsis with acute kidney injury (AKI). Especially in sepsis patients treated with vasopressors. The optimal the blood pressure has been controversial to maintain renal perfusion. This study aims to explore the blood pressure target in sepsis with AKI.MethodsWe retrieved patient data from the MIMIC IV and eICU databases. The Lasso regression model was used to identify the relationship between blood pressure and sepsis in patients with AKI and remove collinearity among variables. Generalized additive models were used to estimate the blood pressure range in patients with sepsis with AKI. Statistical methods such as multivariable logistic regression, propensity score analysis, inversion probability-weighting, and doubly robust model estimation were used to verify the target blood pressure for patients with sepsis and AKI.ResultsIn total, 17874 patients with sepsis were included in this study. the incidence of AKI may be related to the level of mean article pressure (MAP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in sepsis patients. The range of MAPs and DBPs may be 65-73 mmHg and 50-60 mmHg in AKI patients without hypertension. The range of MAPs and DBPs may be 70-80 mmHg and 54-62 mmHg in AKI patients with hypertension. The prognosis of sepsis with AKI was unaffected by MAP or DBP. Systolic blood pressure is not associated with sepsis in patients with AKI.ConclusionsTo ensure renal perfusion, AKI patients with hypertension may require a higher MAP [70-80] versus (65-73), mmHg] and DBP [(54-62) vs (50-60), mmHg] than patients without hypertension.