As an important part of emergency response, the post-disaster emergency resource allocation is essential for mitigating disaster losses. To realize the effective allocation of relief materials and the reasonable selection of transportation routes, a multi-objective resource allocation model is proposed, considering the characteristics of uncertainty and persistence during rescue process. Furthermore, the multi-objective cellular genetic algorithm (MOCGA) is developed to solve the model by introducing the auxiliary population and neighborhood structure in the cellular automata. Finally, the comparison experiment proves that the overall performance of MOCGA is satisfactory compared with non-dominated multi-objective whale optimization algorithm (NSMOWOA), non-dominated multi-objective grey wolf optimizer (NSMOGWO) and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) in the pareto front (PF), the hypervolume, the average value of objective function, and the PF ratio. Results show that MOCGA can solve the multi-objective dynamic emergency resource allocation model well, and can provide decision-makers with more excellent and diverse candidate rescue schemes than other algorithms. Besides, by analyzing the rescue schemes, this paper also provides a theoretical rescue scheme for decision-makers' scientific decisions.
Damage detection is important for the maintenance of automated machines. General non-destructive testing techniques require static equipment and complex analysis processes, which restricts the maintenance of automated machines. Therefore, this paper proposes an acoustic emission (AE) tomography method for detecting cavity damage in automated machines, combining the fast sweeping method (FSM) and the limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L-BFGS) method. This approach overcomes the limitations of real-time AE detection for cavity damage in continuous and homogeneous materials. The proposed method has been applied in numerical and laboratory experiments to validate its feasibility. The results show that the inversed low-velocity regions correspond to the actual cavity regions, and the sources of cavity damage can be effectively detected. This paper provides a new perspective for AE testing technologies, and also lays the foundation for other non-destructive testing techniques, in terms of cavity damage detection.
Public safety and health cannot be secured without the comprehensive recognition of characteristics and reliable emergency response schemes under the disaster chain. Distinct from emergency resource allocation that focuses primarily on a single disaster, dynamic response, periodic supply, and assisted decision-making are necessary. Therefore, we propose a multiobjective emergency resource allocation model considering uncertainty under the natural disaster chain. Resource allocation was creatively combined with path planning through the proposed multiobjective cellular genetic algorithm (MOCGA) and the improved A* algorithm with avoidance of unexpected road elements. Furthermore, timeliness, efficiency, and fairness in actual rescue were optimized by MOCGA. The visualization of emergency trips and intelligent avoidance of risk areas were achieved by the improved A* algorithm. The effects of logistics performance, coupling of disaster factors, and government regulation on emergency resource allocation were discussed based on different disaster chain scenarios. The results show that disruption in infrastructure support, cascading effect of disasters, and time urgency are additional environmental challenges. The proposed model and algorithm work in obtaining the optimal solution for potential regional coordination and resilient supply, with a 22.2% increase in the total supply rate. Cooperative allocation complemented by political regulation can be a positive action for successfully responding to disaster chains.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.