The purpose of the present paper was to investigate the significance of DEK protein expression in uterine cervical lesions and its relationship with HPV infection status. DEK protein expression was studied in 253 cervical lesions, including 30 non-neoplastic cervix with or without squamous metaplasia, 64 cervical intra-epithelial neoplasias (CIN; CIN-1, n = 28; CIN-2, n = 17; CIN-3, n = 19), 102 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 51 adenocarcinomas, and six adenosquamous cell carcinomas (adenoSCC) on immunohistochemistry. For comparison, HPV-positive and -negative cervical cancer cell lines were also included. The HPV screening was performed using TaKaRa polymerase chain reaction. On immunohistochemistry DEK was found to be negative in all 30 non-neoplastic cervical epithelia, but it was positive in 96.1% of SCC (98/102), 92.2% of adenocarcinomas (47/51), 100% of adenoSCC (6/6), 85.7% of CIN-1 (24/28), 94.1% of CIN-2 (16/17), and 89.5% of CIN-3 (17/19). There was no significant difference between HPV-positive and -negative cervical lesions. Also, strongly positive staining was observed in all aforementioned cervical cancer cell lines regardless of HPV infection, according to immunocytochemistry. In summary, DEK plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of cervical cancers, and can be helpful for early diagnosis, and is a potential therapeutic target.

To investigate the clinicopathological significance of DEK overexpression in breast cancers, a total of 196 cases, including 20 of normal tissues, 12 of intraductal hyperplasia, 31 of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 133 of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, were selected from the Department of Pathology, Yanbian Tumor Hospital for immunohistochemical staining of DEK, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and Ki-67 proteins. In results, DEK protein had higher positivity in DCIS, compared with the adjacent normal breast tissues. Also, DEK protein was strongly positive in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast on immunohistochemistry, which was significantly higher than normal breast tissues. However, only two (2/12) cases of intraductal hyperplasia of the breast showed positive staining for DEK protein. Additionally, DEK overexpression was significantly correlated with the increased proliferating index of Ki-67. For the histological grade, DEK positive rate was only 39.6% in G1 breast cancers, but significantly higher in G2 (92.3%) and G3 (97.0%) cases (P<0.05). Also, a strongly positive rate of DEK was lower in Stage-0 (21.4%) and Stage-I (40.9%) compared with Stage-IIa (87.5%), Stage-IIb (89.7%) and Stage-IIIa (92.3%) (P<0.05). And DEK protein showed higher expression level in < 3 years disease free survival breast cancers than it did in ≥ 3 years disease free survival cases (P<0.05). However, no statistically difference was found among DEK expression, lymph node metastasis, and ER and PR expressions. In conclusion, DEK overexpression appears to be associated with breast cancer progression and DEK may potentially be used as a breast cancer biomarker for the early diagnosis, prognostic evaluation and therapeutic target for breast cancer.

Maspin is a unique serine proteinase inhibitor that has tumor suppressor activity. It has been reported that maspin is expressed in normal human mammary epithelial cells and it is down-regulated during the progression of cancer. However, to date, there is very limited data on the clinical significance of maspin expression in human breast cancer. In this study, maspin expression was assessed immunohistochemically from 80 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) specimens of the breast. Also, maspin expression was compared with the clinicopathological factors (age, grade, tumor size and lymph node status), the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and p53, DNA ploidy and the overall survival in an attempt to assess its prognostic value. The maspin expression was positive in 25 IDC cases (31.3%). The maspin expression in IDC was significantly correlated with a higher histologic grade, a larger tumor size, a positive p53 status and shorter survival. There was an inverse association with maspin expression and the PR status. These findings suggest that maspin expression is not down-regulated with the progression of cancer and maspin expression may be associated with a poor prognosis. The immunohistochemical detection of maspin in breast cancers may be helpful for predicting an aggressive phenotype.

Immunohistochemical staining for DeltaNp63 is a powerful marker for squamous differentiation and useful in exclusion of glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation in uterine cervical cancers, but not always in endometrial cancers.

No abstract