Objectives
We aimed to investigate prolactin (PRL) levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), synovial fluid, and serum in patients suffering from moderately active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with and without periodontitis (P). Further, to evaluate the effect of non-surgical periodontal treatment on these levels compared to controls.
Materials and methods
Eighty subjects were divided into 4 groups: group 1: 20 patients with RA + P, group 2: 20 periodontitis patients (systemically healthy), group 3: RA patients (periodontally healthy), and group 4: healthy controls. Patients with periodontitis received scaling and root planning (SRP). PRL was measured using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.
Results
At baseline, in GCF of RA + P group showed the highest mean PRL levels, followed by P group whereas groups 3 and 4 showed a statistically less values than the first 2 groups. Serum values showed non-significant difference between the first three groups, although higher than healthy controls. SRP reduced GCF and serum levels of PRL in both P groups as well as synovial fluid PRL in group 1. SRP caused no change in DAS scores while reduced ESR values were observed in group 1 after treatment.
Conclusions
Local GCF and synovial levels of PRL seem to be linked to the disease process of both periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis than serum levels. SRP reduced these local levels.
Clinical relevance
In patients with RA and CP, local PRL seems to play a role in the association between the two conditions; further, periodontal treatment is essential to improve periodontal condition in RA patients.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04279691.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.