The use of different sustainable materials in the manufacture of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is becoming increasingly common due to the unabating concerns over climate change and sustainability in the construction sector. Reactive powder concrete (RPC) is an UHPC in which traditional coarse aggregates are replaced by fine aggregates. The main purpose of this research is to produce RPC using dune sand and to study its microstructure and mechanical properties under different curing conditions of water curing and hot air curing. The effects of these factors are studied over a long-term period of 90 days. Quartz sand is completely replaced by a blend of crushed and dune sand, and cement is partially replaced by using binary blends of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash (FA), which are used alongside silica fume (SF) to make a ternary supplementary binder system. Microstructural analysis is conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and engineering properties like compressive strength and flexural strength are studied to evaluate the performance of dune sand RPC. Overall, the results affirm that the production of UHPC is possible with the use of dune sand. The compressive strength of all mixes exceeded 120 MPa after 12 h only of hot air curing (HAC). The SEM results revealed the dense microstructure of RPC. However, goethite-like structures (corrosion products) were spotted at 90 days for all HAC specimens. Additionally, the use of FA accelerated the formation of such products as compared to GGBS. The effect of these products was insignificant from a mechanical point of view. However, additional research is required to determine their effect on the durability of RPC.
The performance of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) reinforced with BFRP bars was investigated in this research study. To achieve the objectives of this study, a total of six UHPC beams were cast and tested for flexure, under displacement-controlled loading conditions. The performance of BFRP-reinforced beams was compared against GFRP and steel reinforced beams. All beams had a cross-section of 185 mm × 250 mm, and a total length of 2200 mm. The experimental results were presented and discussed in terms of cracking moments, cracking patterns, failure modes, flexural capacity, midspan deflection, as well as strains in concrete and reinforcement. Results showed that UHPC enhanced the flexural performance of BFRP-reinforced beams in terms of moment capacity, deflection response and cracking patterns. The experimental results were complimented with analytical results that were calculated using the ACI 440 and CAN/CSA S806 code provisions. It was found that moment predictions using relevant ACI equations are acceptable for under-reinforced beams, but were slightly unconservative for the over-reinforced beams.
Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars are deemed to be one of the best solutions to the corrosion dilemma associated with steel reinforcement. This paper presents an experimental study on the behavior of Basalt FRP bars subjected to impact loading. Dynamic tests were conducted on eighteen BFRP bars of 17 mm and 20 mm diameters (B17 and B20) using the drop hammer test procedure. Different loading rates were achieved through varying the weight of mass and height of fall. The paper evaluated the maximum stresses attained by the BFRP bars at various loading rates. As the loading rate increased, the B20 bars reported a higher strength value. However, the B17 bars showed a drop in the strength with the increase of the loading rate, which requires further investigation. The crushing was observed to be most prominent in the top part of the bars where the bars exhibited a conical shape after failure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.