COVID-19 has grown into a global pandemic that has strained healthcare throughout the world. There is a sense of urgency in finding a cure for this deadly virus. In this study, we reviewed the empiric options used in common practice for COVID-19, based on the literature available online, with an emphasis on human experiences with these treatments on severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-COV-1) and other viruses. Convalescent blood products are the most promising potential treatment for use in COVID-19. The use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), remdesivir, and tocilizumab are some of the other promising potential therapies; however, they are yet to be tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The use of lopinavir-ritonavir did not prove beneficial in a large RCT. The use of corticosteroids should be avoided in COVID-19 pneumonia unless used for other indications, based on the suggestion of harm in patients with SARS-COV-1 and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) infection. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of diabetes; however, many clinical conditions affect the HbA1c level, including anemia. And, the most common causes of anemia worldwide include iron deficiency anemia (IDA). We performed a systematic search using different combinations of MeSH words from the electronic database for the last 10 years (2011 to 2020). Articles included in the study were observational, randomized controlled trial (RCT), and review/systematic review. A total of 18 articles were included in the study. The majority of the studies showed the association between hemoglobin (Hb) and HbA1c. Large-scale studies showed that the HbA1c level increases in IDA and some studies showed its correction after the treatment with oral iron supplementation. Our study indicates the need for screening for anemia in patients before commencing the treatment of diabetes diagnosed via the HbA1c level. Furthermore, anemia should be corrected before setting the treatment goal of optimal HbA1c control, especially when the level is in the diagnostic threshold. Also, the purpose of strict HbA1c control is not recommended in the anemic patient before it is corrected. However, further large-scale interventional studies are needed to know precisely the goal of optimal HbA1c control in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.

No abstract

Objectives To investigate whether COVID-19 patients with pulmonary embolism had higher mortality and assess the utility of d-dimer in predicting acute pulmonary embolism. Patients and methods Using the National Collaborative COVID-19 retrospective cohort, a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients was studied to compare 90-day mortality and intubation outcomes in patients with and without pulmonary embolism in a multivariable cox regression analysis. The secondary measured outcomes in 1:4 propensity score-matched analysis included length of stay, chest pain incidence, heart rate, history of pulmonary embolism or DVT, and admission laboratory parameters. Results Among 31,500 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 1117 (3.5%) patients were diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism were noted to have higher mortality (23.6% vs.12.8%; adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 1.36, 95% CI [1.20–1.55]), and intubation rates (17.6% vs. 9.3%, aHR = 1.38[1.18–1.61]). Pulmonary embolism patients had higher admission D-dimer FEU (Odds Ratio(OR) = 1.13; 95%CI [1.1–1.15]). As the d-dimer value increased, the specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the test increased; however, sensitivity decreased (AUC 0.70). At cut-off d-dimer FEU 1.8 mcg/ml, the test had clinical utility (accuracy 70%) in predicting pulmonary embolism. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism had a higher incidence of chest pain and history of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions Acute pulmonary embolism is associated with worse mortality and morbidity outcomes in COVID-19. We present d-dimer as a predictive risk tool in the form of a clinical calculator for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19.

Asthma patients have commonly been prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as the first line of control therapy. ICSs are associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive airway disease (COPD) patients. However, the evidence remains controversial in asthma patients. Several observational studies reported an increased risk of pneumonia; however, COPD patients were not excluded clearly in these studies. In observational studies that excluded COPD patients and in randomized controlled trials, ICS use was not found to be associated with the risk of pneumonia. Hence, COPD patients should be excluded in future studies, and the currently available evidence demonstrates that ICS use is not associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in asthma patients.