We report a case of rapidly progressive frontotemporal dementia presenting at age 33 years. At autopsy there was severe atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes. Tau-positive Pick bodies, which ultrastructurally were composed of straight filaments, were present, accompanied by severe neuronal loss and gliosis. RD3, a tau antibody specific for the three-repeat (3R) isoforms, labeled the Pick bodies. ET3, a four-repeat (4R) isoform-specific tau antibody, did not label Pick bodies, but highlighted rare astrocytes, and threads in white matter bundles in the corpus striatum. Analysis of the tau gene revealed an L266V mutation in exon 9. Analysis of brain tissue from this case revealed elevated levels of exon 10+ tau RNA and soluble 4R tau. However, both 3R and 4R isoforms were present in sarkosyl-insoluble tau fractions with a predominance of the shortest 3R isoform. The L266V mutation is associated with decreased rate and extent of tau-induced microtubule assembly, and a 3R isoform-specific increase in tau self assembly as measured by an in vitro assay. Combined, these data indicate that L266V is a pathogenic tau mutation that is associated with Pick-like pathology. In addition, the results of the RD3 and ET3 immunostains clearly explain for the first time the presence of both 3R and 4R tau isoforms in preparations of insoluble tau from some Pick's disease cases.

We obtained apolipoprotein E genotyping in a population of 12 consecutive patients who fulfilled rigorous criteria for the clinical diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The allele frequencies were 4% for E2, 83% for E3, and 13% for E4. This pattern of allele distribution was significantly different from the pattern seen in groups of patients either with the clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (PRAD) or the histopathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The E4 allele frequency in the group of patients with PPA was in the range seen in control populations and was much lower than the one reported in populations of patients with PRAD or AD. The E4 allele is therefore not a significant risk factor for developing PPA. These results provide neurobiological support for the syndromic distinction of PPA from PRAD and are in keeping with neuropathologic evidence showing that the vast majority of patients with PPA do not have the histopathology of AD. Although we do not yet have neuropathologic information on our patients, these results indicate that the clinical diagnosis of PPA has biological validity in that it identifies a population that is genetically different from the population of patients with a clinical diagnosis of PRAD.

No abstract