Microsurgery, which deservedly sits on top of the reconstruction ladder, has been a boon to plastic surgery. It is because of this marvelous tool that plastic surgeons the world over have been able to tackle many reconstructive dilemmas, which were once considered to be an improbability. Microsurgery-aided revolutions have rendered a new meaning to all forms of reconstruction—whether it is postoncological, posttraumatic, or postlymphedema reconstruction. As the most advanced reconstructive medium at our disposal that has broadened the horizons of plastic surgery exponentially, it is but obvious that many budding plastic surgeons are drawn toward this subspecialty. In lieu of the aforementioned facts, it is necessary to sensitize all such aspiring surgeons about the various intricacies concerning the field of microsurgery. This article with its focus on the six desirable microsurgical attributes of “Clarity, Curiosity, Perseverance, Passion, An Open Mindset and Action,” is meant to be a modest attempt on part of the authors to share their microsurgical insights, procured through their respective journeys, with budding aspirants, hoping to sensitize as well as motivate them for the challenging path that lies ahead.

Background: Microsurgical amelioration of lymphedema has gained much traction in recent years and is now an established modality of treatment for this condition. Despite the development of many newer techniques, lymphaticovenous anastomosis still remains the most frequently carried out microsurgical procedure for lymphedema. One of the most common hurdles faced by lymphatic surgeons while carrying out a lymphaticovenous anastomosis is a mismatch in sizes of the vein and the lymphatic vessels. Method: This article describes a novel but simple “double barrel” technique, developed by the authors for carrying out lymphaticovenous anastomosis in cases of such lymphaticovenous mismatch. Seventeen double barrel anastomoses were carried out in 12 lymphedema patients, over a 4-year period from 2017 to 2021. Results: The overall success rate was 100%, as measured by clinical observation (venous washout, lymphatic backflow), the Acland vessel strip test, and by means of intraoperative ICG lymphography. Mild leakage was observed in four cases after release of the venous clamp and was corrected by application of additional sutures. Conclusions: The double barrel technique is a safe and effective tool that can be employed to deal with the bane of size mismatch, a persistent problem faced by lymphedema surgeons universally. Although we do not advocate it as a total replacement for other techniques, it can be a worthy addition to the present set of available options. In specific scenarios of mismatch with additional challenges, the double barrel technique has the potential to be considered as primus inter pares.