Inflammatory markers, particularly hs-CRP and to a lesser extent, fibrinogen and ESR, can be used to assist in assessing disease severity and response to treatment in patients with psoriasis. A combination of selected inflammatory factors (which we term the Index of Psoriasis Inflammation) in combination with PASI might reflect inflammatory status in psoriasis more accurately than each one separately.

Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an immune-mediated seronegative arthritis that belongs to the group of spondyloarthropathies and develops after a gastrointestinal or genitourinary system infection. The condition is considered to be characterized by a triad of symptoms (conjunctivitis, arthritis and urethritis) although a constellation of other manifestations may also be present. ReA is characterized by psoriasiform dermatological manifestations that may resemble those of pustular psoriasis and, similar to guttate psoriasis, is a post-infectious entity. Also, the articular manifestations of the disorder are similar to those of psoriatic arthritis and both conditions show a correlation with HLA-B27. These facts have led several authors to suggest that there is a connection between ReA and psoriasis, listing ReA among the disorders related to psoriasis. However, the pathogenetic mechanism behind the condition is complex and poorly understood. Bacterial antigenicity, the type of host response (i.e. Th1/Th2 imbalance) and various genetic factors (i.e. HLA-B27 etc.) play an important role in the development of the disorder. It is unknown whether all the aforementioned factors are part of a mechanism that could be similar to, or share basic aspects with known psoriasis pathogenesis mechanisms.

The psychological burden is heavier and quality of life is more severely impaired among women with scarring alopecia compared with non-scarring alopecia, probably depicting the poorer prognosis of the former.

Biologics, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists, have revolutionized treatment of several significant inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, issues concerning long-term safety remain to be clarified. There is growing evidence linking biological treatments with the occurrence of malignancies or reactivation of latent ones, including malignant melanoma. We report the case of a 75-year-old male patient who developed 2 primary malignant melanomas (MM) after treatment with adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis. He was under adalimumab treatment for approximately 12 months before the diagnosis of MM on his right lower leg. After surgical removal and staging, no evidence of metastases was found. A few months later, a second MM developed on the patient’s scalp. The short duration of treatment with adalimumab and the unclear temporal relationship cannot adequately support a probable link between this double MM occurrence and the adalimumab-induced immunosuppressive state. The result of a literature search regarding the possible association between anti-TNF drugs and melanocytic proliferation is provided.

Immunization with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is effective and safe with an estimated incidence of adverse reactions, either local or systemic, of less than 0.1%. Cutaneous side effects are rare and include lichen planus (LP) and lichenoid reactions. We report the case of a 21-year-old female, in whom a persistent, papulonodular lesion developed at the site of the injection, 6 weeks after the second dose of the HBV. Histological examination revealed lichenoid and pseudolymphomatous features. In addition, sensitization to thiomersal, a vaccine constituent, was documented by patch testing. The association of LP with chronic liver disease is well established. Furthermore, less than 20 cases of lichen or lichenoid reactions, following HBV vaccination, have been reported. Although several arguments have been presented, it is still debated whether there is a causal association or the occurrence of LP following HBV vaccination is a simple coincidence. It has been speculated that a T-cell-mediated, graft-versus-host-like reaction, triggered by a sensitizing protein, is directed against keratinocytes expressing an epitope of hepatitis B surface antigen or a similar epitope. Our case may represent a localized lichenoid reaction to HBV vaccination, a local reactive hyperplasia or a persisting delayed hypersensitivity reaction to a vaccine constituent. This is the first case of a local lichenoid reaction at the injection site of the HBV vaccine, providing further documentation for a causal association linking the HBV vaccine with LP.