No abstract

Introduction: the normal functioning of the civil turnover is impossible without free and independent implementation of their subjective rights by the participants of the civil legal relations. This is possible when the law provides not only a mechanism for protecting subjective civil rights, but also a detailed regulated procedure for their implementation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the concepts and content of subjective rights and their protection. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is a set of methods of scientific knowledge, among which the main are the historical and comparative law methods, the methods of systematicity and analysis. Results: the paper analyzes the views on the mechanism of acquisition/establishment and implementation of civil rights, as well as the mechanism of protection of subjective civil rights. As a result, the conclusion about the supremacy of the legal mechanism of acquisition/establishment and implementation of subjective civil rights is substantiated. Conclusions: the paper substantiates the approach according to which the implementation of subjective rights should be provided not so much by the mechanism of protection as by the appropriate means of acquisition/establishment and implementation of subjective civil rights. They are fundamental and essential, and the protection mechanism should be "included" as a backup and only if the civil regulation of the processes of acquisition/establishment and implementation of subjective rights will not be able to achieve the desired legal result.

Introduction: the legal regulation of the relations on compensation of harm has always been a subject of interest to the jurists. The vast majority of researchers of the relations associated with damages associated with their category of civil liability. However, in the legal literature is justified liability the legal nature of considered relations, in this connection, the authors set the purpose of the research available positions by the author about the legal nature of the relationship of the damage caused. Methods: the methodological basis of this study constitute a set of scientific methods, among which the main place is occupied by the historical method, systemic analysis and comparative-legal. Results: grounded in the work of the author's position is based on the law and the opinion of the competent scientific community on the issues of obligations and legal relations connected with compensation of the harm caused. On the basis of the analysis examines the conditions of civil liability, the analysis of the current civil law, the basic existing in theory of law the position of the authors regarding responsibility, social responsibility, and legal liability as a form of social responsibility. Conclusion: in the study it is proposed to change the existing in modern civic science approach to the legal nature of legal relations connected with compensation of the harm caused. The authors indicated that in modern civil-legal regulation it is necessary to revise the view of compensation of the harm caused as to civil liability in favor of its contractual nature. It is noted that this approach is due to legal stipulations to this type of legal relations that requires a deep scientific study.

No abstract

No abstract