Over the past forty years, China has shown rapid and significant economic growth, going from agrarian to industrial economy: its GDP has been increasing by an average of 9.8% per year, which represents dynamic economic growth thus making China the second largest economy in the world after the USA in terms of nominal GDP. Due to the specific history of its economic development, China faces the problem of serious destruction and pollution of life-supporting natural resources. Environmental degradation is already in conflict with the challenges of further economic growth necessary to meet the needs of the growing population and improve its standard of living. Based on this, the study of the influence of economic development on China’s environmental problems in the context of modern development seems to be particularly relevant in theoretical and practical terms. To test the hypothesis of the relationship of economic development and environmental problems in China, a correlation-regression analysis has been conducted: we have identified 22 pairs of indicators with moderate and strong relationships. Using the Engle-Granger criterion method, we checked the presence of true causal relationship between the indicators and we found that the studied pairs of indicators do not cointegrate, i.e. there is no true causal relationship between the indicators of economic development and environmental indicators. This result led us to the conclusion that there is a significant difference in the rates of economic development and environmental protection. The result of evaluating the effectiveness of investments in solving the problems of environmental pollution in the PRC has shown that insufficient attention is paid to investments in the control and control of water pollution and pollution by industrial wastes. Government investments in these areas for pollution control are ineffective.

The relevance of the article is determined by the fact that a state registration of rights in the Consolidated State Register of Real Estate is considered as the undoubted evidence of the existence of a registered right and is interpreted by the courts as a disputable presumption.The purpose of the article is to study judicial practice in order to understand the significance of the public reliability of CSRRE data.The objectives of the article are to analyze the current legislation of the state registration of real estate, determine the features of real estate, as well as identify legal mechanisms for disproving the reliability of CSRRE data.Methodology. In the article authors use scientific methods, such as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, description, formal-legal method.Results. The public reliability of a data of the CSRRE are established procedures for the implementation of state cadastral registration and (or) state registration of rights, as well as procedures for eliminating registry errors in the CSRRE. The question of the reliability of a data of the CSRRE concerns both the characteristics of real estate objects and the rights to them. For ensuring the reliability of a data of the CSRRE are also noted organizational and technical means.Conclusions. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, the author comes to conclusion that the courts demonstrate a clear understanding of the value of the public reliability of the CSRRE, which is legally provided by established procedures for the implementation of state cadastral registration and (or) state registration of rights, including the legal examination of the documents submitted for this purpose, as well as procedures for eliminating registry errors in the CSRRE, which can be implemented both by the decision of the state registrar of rights and on the initiative of interested persons in an administrative and (or) judicial procedure.