Aim: To identify correlations between quality of life (QoL), emotional and mental state in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to evaluate its contribution in prediction of compliance. Materials & methods: The T2DM patients aged 18–75 years with at least 12 weeks of stable hypoglycemic therapy were included to this cross-sectional study. We used Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) for mental state assessment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression level and EQ-5D for QoL. Compliance level was self-reported by patients. Results: The QoL positively correlates with MMSE score (p < 0.0001) and negatively with HADS anxiety (p < 0.0001) and depression (p < 0.0001) levels. The MMSE score is higher (p < 0.0001), and both HADS levels are lower (p < 0.01) in patients with higher compliance level. Conclusion: Cognitive function and psychoemotional state in T2DM patients are important for treatment compliance and QoL and are to be corrected whenever possible.
Aim: To compare safety (immunogenicity) and efficacy of GP40061 insulin glargine (GP-Gla) and Lantus® (Sanofi glargine, Sa-Gla) in people with diabetes mellitus. Materials & methods: This randomized open-label, 26-week clinical trial enrolled 180 Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients (HbA1c 6.5–12.0%), randomized 1:1 to once daily GP-Gla (n = 90) or Sa-Gla (n = 90). The primary end point was immune response at 26th week. Results: The frequency of immune response was similar in GP-Gla and Sa-Gla (p = 1.000). Groups were similar in terms of other safety end points. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.66% for GP-Gla and -0.77% for Sa-Gla, and did not differ between groups (p = 0.326). Insulin doses, fasting plasma glucose and seven-point glucose profiles were similar between groups. Conclusion: GP-Gla and Sa-Gla demonstrated similar safety and efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04022993
Background: The effects of liraglutide on body weight and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) level vary greatly. The cost of this drug negatively affects treatment adherence. Aim: To reveal the baseline patient characteristics, associated with a better response to liraglutide. Materials and methods: A total of 41 patients with BMI of 39.63 ± 7.59 kg/m2 who received liraglutide injection up to 1.8 or 3.0 mg/day for 6 months were enrolled. Demographic and anthropometric data, parameters of glycemic control, food intake, hormones and responses to the eating behavior questionnaire were collected. Results: Weight reduction was dose-dependent (p = 0.007). Liraglutide was not effective in patients with BMI >45 kg/m2. The baseline HbA1c level was a significant factor for HbA1c reduction. Lower leptin and higher glucagon-like-peptide 1 concentrations might predict better weight loss response to liraglutide. Conclusion: Drug-specific efficacy predictors were assumed; thus, further studies are needed to prove their significance.
Aim: To compare safety (immunogenicity) and efficacy of a biosimilar insulin GP-Lis25 and a reference insulin Ly-Lis25 (Humalog Mix 25) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients. Materials & methods: This randomized open-label, 26-week clinical trial enrolled 210 T2D patients, randomized 1:1 to twice-daily GP-Lis25 or Ly-Lis25. The primary end point was immune response at 26th week. Noninferiority margin for HbA1c was 0.4%. Results: Immune response frequency was similar in GP-Lis25 and Ly-Lis25 groups both at week 12 (p = 0.651) and 26 (p = 0.164). The difference of HbA1c change at week 26 was (95% CI) 0.01 (-0.27–0.28)%. Fasting plasma glucose, seven-point glucose profile and insulin dose were similar between groups. Safety did not differ between groups. Conclusion: GP-Lis25 and Ly-Lis25 demonstrated similar safety and efficacy. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023344 .
Considering the received data and the existed knowledge on CYP2C9 influence on SUs pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, we propose a possible approach to CYP2C9-guided SUs prescription for Russians.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.