No abstract

Introduction. Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) reinforcement has a relatively low modulus of elasticity compared to steel. In this connection, the bent members with such reinforcement have a higher deformability. The stress-strain diagram for FRP under short-term loading is almost straight and does not have a yield line, as in steel reinforcement. At the same time, modern methods of calculating structures with for FRP reinforcement are based on existing approaches for reinforced concrete structures. In this regard, the current direction for study is to assess the reliability and improve the existing methods for calculating members with FRP reinforcement for the serviceability limit states. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Deflections calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the deformability of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. The inaccurate determination of the cracking moment Mcrc has a negative impact on the results of the deflection calculation. The deviation of the theoretical values of the cracking moment according to the method of Construction rules and regulations 295.1325800.2017 from the experimental ones is 26.2–59.1 %, in the method of ACI 440.1 R-06 — 20.1–57.1 %. For the ACI 440.1 R-06 method, the calculation is more accurate, in which the short-term deflection was multiplied by the factor λ = 0,6ξ = 0,6 · 2 = 1,2, for the Construction rules and regulations 295.1325800.2017 method — when using ψf = 1 – 0,8Mcrc / M. Conclusions. The results obtained showed the need to improve the considered calculation methods. To increase the accuracy of the calculation of deflections according to the method of SP 295.1325800.2017, at the first stage, it is possible to approximate the theoretical values of the cracking moment to the experimental data by introducing correction factor in the equation according to the calculation of Mcrc: for beams with a GFRP high-bond bars — 0.7, for BFRP with a sanded surface — 0.5.

No abstract

Introduction. Rebars, made of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP), have a number of distinguishing characteristics and disadvantages along with well-known strengths, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high corrosion resistance, and low thermal conductivity. One of its principal strengths is the modulus of elasticity which is relatively low compared to steel. As a result, elements, having FRP reinforcement, feature higher deformability. In this regard, the requirements of serviceabi-lity limit states, applicable to structures, may become the main obstacle to the use of FRP as the reinforcement for concrete members. It is assumed that cracking patterns of members, having FRP reinforcement, may differ from those of traditional reinforced concrete structures. Materials and methods. Experimental studies were carried with regard for and in compliance with the provisions of National State Standard 8829-94. Tested samples represented concrete beams that were 1,810 mm long and had a cross section of 120 × 220 mm. Their tensile side was reinforced with two bars. Steel, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars were used to reinforce the beams. The value of the reinforcement ratio varied. Crack width calculation methods, applied according to Construction rules and regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017 (Russia) and ACI 440.1R-06 (USA) were analyzed. Results. The results of the theoretical and experimental studies of the crack resistance of flexural members having FRP reinforcement are obtained. Discrepancies between the calculation methods are identified. Conclusions. Сracking patterns, typical for members having FRP reinforcement, are specified. They contest the applicabi-lity of methods, prescribed in the Construction Rules and Regulations. The methods, prescribed by Construction Rules and Regulations 63.13330.2012 and 295.1325800.2017, differ in respect of crack width calculations, and it leads to diverging calculation results.

No abstract