No abstract

Aim.Comparison of in-hospital results of two strategies on an aimed incomplete myocardial revascularization (AIMR) ONCAB and MIDCAB of left anterior descending artery (LAD) in multivessel coronary disease patients.Material and methods.To the study, 63 patients included with achieved AIMR (LAD shunting) in multivessel disease. All patients, depending on the strategy of revascularization, were selected to 2 groups: 1. ONCAB (47,6%, n=30) and 2. MIDCAB (52,4%, n=33).Results.In the early post-surgery period of follow-up, among the adverse cardiovascular events, in the general selection of patients, there was non-fatal Q-myocardial infarction in MIDCAB group, followed by a decline of the left ventricle ejection fraction from 65% to 38%. ONCAB group was characterized by higher volume intra-operational blood loss, rate of wound and hemorrhagic complications, that in one case led to remediastinotomy, and in every tenth patient — blood transfusion during the early period. In our study, the chosen surgical strategy was the only alternative to medication therapy.Conclusion.In the study, at in-hospital stage of management there were comparable outcomes of AIMR with either ONCAB and MIDCAB. Nevertheless, coronary bypass with MIDCAB technology demonstrated a range of benefits related to decreased risk of hemorrhagic complications, wound infection and lower duration of hospitalization.

Aim To evaluate in-hospital and long-term outcomes of myocardial and cerebral revascularization with combined or staged PCI and carotid endarterectomy.Methods.263 myocardial and cerebral revascularizations with PCI and CEA in patients with combined cerebral and coronary artery lesions in the period from 2011 to 2017 were performed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the surgical strategy. Patient (n = 133) who underwent a staged intervention (CEA and PCI) were included in Group 1, whereas patients (n = 130) who underwent a hybrid intervention (CEE+PCI CA) were included in Group 2. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years.Results.100% of patients in Group 2 underwent coronary and internal carotid revascularization according to the results of in-hospital and long-term follow-up. 81.35% of patient in Group 1 underwent PCI and CEA, whereas 3.01% of patients underwent only PCI and 6.77% of patients – CEA. 1.5% of patients in Group 1 did not receive any surgical treatment. The most common causes of incomplete revascularization were the subsequent change of the initially defined treatment for myocardial (6.02%) or cerebral revascularization (0.75%). The rest refused the second stage, or it was associated with extremely high risk and the strategy was switched to the conservative therapy.Conclusion.100% of patients received hybrid myocardial and cerebral revascularization during one hospitalization. It allowed reducing mortality from MI and stroke during the waiting period for the next stage of the treatment in Group 1 (almost 5%). Hybrid interventions can be used in patients with high risk for open-heart surgery, severe comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, renal dysfunction), significant coronary and cerebral artery lesions with high risk of MI and stroke. However, hybrid approach was associated with high rate (almost 7%) of non-fatal MI in the long-term follow-up.

Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Научно-исследовательский институт комплексных проблем сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний», Кемерово, Российская Федерация Реваскуляризация головного мозга и миокарда при мультифокальном атеросклерозе: современный взгляд на проблему Конфликт интересов Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов. Финансирование Исследование не имело спонсорской поддержки.

Aim. To analyze factors affecting the availability of hybrid cerebral and myocardial revascularization by synchronous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA).Material and methods. This retrospective study included 263 patients with coronary and internal carotid artery involvement undergoing PCI and CEA during the period from 2011 to 2017.Results. The study revealed the following factors increasing the availability of revascularization: hybrid cerebral and myocardial revascularization, successful PCI using drug-eluting stents, postPCI TIMI flow grade 3, and radial access for PCI. The following factors reduced the availability: polyvascular disease >50% in three beds, prior PCI, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, left coronary artery involvement, living without a family, staged revascularization, CEA before PCI, unsuccessful/complicated PCI with post-PCI TIMI flow grades of 0-1, residual SYNTAX score >9, emergency hospitalization and multiple emergency PCI of the coronary arteries in the long-term follow-up period.Conclusion. Comprehensive analysis of clinical, demographic, anatomical, angiographic, and perioperative factors made it possible to identify predictors that affect the availability of hybrid revascularization.