No abstract

No abstract

The paper analyzes the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti49.8Ni50.2 alloy (at.%) under uniaxial tension at room temperature after isothermal abc pressing to true strains e = 0.29−8.44 at T = 723 K. The analysis shows that as the true strain e is increased, the grain–subgrain structure of the alloy is gradually refined. This leads to an increase in its yield stress σy and strain hardening coefficient θ = dσ/dε at linear stage III of its tensile stress–strain curve according to the Hall–Petch relation. However, the ultimate tensile strength remains invariant to such refinement. The possible mechanism is proposed to explain why the ultimate tensile strength can remain invariant to the average grains size (dav). It is assumed that the sharp increase of the ultimate tensile strength σUTS begins when (dav) is less than the critical average grain size (dav)cr. In our opinion, for the investigated alloy (dav)cr ≈ 0.5 µm. In our study, the attained average grain size is larger the critical one. The main idea of the mechanism is next. In alloys with an average grain size (dav) less than the critical one, a higher external stress is required for the nucleation and propagation of the main crack.

This paper presents experimental data on the microstructure and martensite transformation temperatures of Ti49.8Ni50.2 (at%) after abc pressing (multi-axial forging) to different true strains e from 1.84 to 9.55 at 573 K. The data show that increasing the true strain results in grain–subgrain refinement on different scales at a time. With e = 9.55 at 573 K, the average grain–subgrain size measured approximately 130 nm. Decreasing the abc pressing temperature from 723 to 573 K caused a decrease in all martensite transformation temperatures, a change in the lattice parameters, R phase formation, and angular shifts of diffraction peaks and their broadening. The largest change in the microstructure of Ti49.8Ni50.2 was provided by abc pressing to e = 1.84. Increasing the true strain to e = 9.55 resulted in a much smaller effect, suggesting that the alloy obtained a high density of structural defects even at e = 1.84. Two possible mechanisms of grain–subgrain refinement are discussed.

No abstract