Introduction. Kidney damage at the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) is observed in 20–40 % of patients, which requires renal replacement therapy in 2–4 % of cases. Deterioration in kidney function is associated with frequent complications and a decline in the quality of life, as well as carries a high risk of early death.Aim. To analyze the treatment of patients first diagnosed with MM, complicated by severe and dialysis-dependent renal failure.Materials and methods. 62 MM patients with a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min /1.73 m2 participated in a retrospective study (11.2014–11.2017) with the following inclusion criteria: the concentration of free light chains in blood serum being >500 mg/l and the selective nature of proteinuria. Diagnosed AL-amyloidosis served as the exclusion criterion. Depending on the need for haemodialysis, patients were divided into two groups: (I) those not requiring it (n = 16) and (II) dialysis-dependent patients (n = 46).Results. The induction therapy included the following bortezomib-containing regimens: VCD — 41 (66.1 %), PAD — 2 (3.2 %), VD — 12 (19.4 %) and VMP — 7 (11.3 %). High-dose consolidation along with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed in 10 patients (16.1 %). The overall rate of anti-myeloma response in the groups came to 64.3 % (I) and 85.3 % (II) (p = 0.047), including complete and strong complete remissions in 14.3 % (I) and 14.7 % (II) of cases. The renal response was achieved by 57.2 % and 23.5 % (p = 0.032) of patients from the first and second groups, respectively. With a median follow-up of 32.1 months, throughout the entire cohort the median of progression-free survival (PFS) amounted to 14.5 months, with a 3-year PFS of 27.4 ± 6.6 %; whereas the median of overall survival (OS) came to 33.6 months, with a 3-year OS of 41.5 ± 7.7 %. There are no differences between the compared groups in terms of the survival rates. In the examined patients (n = 48), the achievement of any renal response was associated with an improvement in the 3-year PFS — 61.1 ± 11.5 % versus 17.7 ± 7.7 % (p = 0.045) — and 3-year OS — 72,2 ± 10.6 % versus 38.1 ± 10.4 % (p= 0.069). The time elapsed between the first haemodialysis procedure and the onset of anti-myeloma chemotherapy served as the predictor value of the renal response. In the group of patients who achieved a renal response, the average time came to 8.6 (95 % confidence interval of 3.5–13.7) days, as compared to 42.5 (12.6–72.5) days for patients without a renal response (p = 0.045).Conclusion. The use of bortezomib-based regimens provides a high frequency of antitumour responses with a probability of stopping dialysis in 23.5 % of dialysis-dependent patients. Possible reasons for the low frequency of renal response include the late diagnosis of MM as a cause of kidney damage, as well as the lack of access to new anti-myeloma drugs if the induction therapy needs to be changed.

No abstract

Журнал для непрерывного медицинского образования врачей COVID-19 у больных, получающих лечение программным гемодиализом ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ 1 Государственное бюджетное учреждение здравоохранения города Москвы «Городская клиническая больница № 52 Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы», 123182, г. Москва, Российская Федерация 2 Федеральное бюджетное учреждение науки «Московский научноисследовательский институт эпидемиологии и микробиологии им. Г.Н. Габричевского» Федеральной службы по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека, 125212, г. Москва, Российская Федерация 3 Филиал федерального государственного бюджетного военного образовательного учреждения высшего образования «Военно-медицинская академия имени С.М. Кирова» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации, 107392, г. Москва, Российская Федерация 4 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Московский государственный медикостоматологический университет имени А.И. Евдокимова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 127473, г. Москва, Российская Федерация 5 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. Н.Н. Бурденко» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации, 105229, г. Москва, Российская Федерация

BACKGROUND: Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) and patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are at a high risk of adverse clinical course of COVID-19. To date, the causes of high mortality in these groups are not fully understood. Data about peculiarity of clinical course and Tocilizumab (TCZ) administration in patients with T2DM receiving MHD due to outcome of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are not yet highlighted in current publications.AIMS: Identification of risk factors (RF) of adverse COVID-19 outcome and evaluation of TCZ administration in patients with T2DM receiving MHD due to DKD.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients treated in Moscow City Hospital No52 were included in retrospective observational study. The observation period was from 04.15 to 07.30 2020. The study endpoints were the outcomes of hospitalization — discharge or lethal outcome. Data were collected from electronic medical database. The following independent variables were analysed: gender, age, body mass index, time from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission, cardiovascular and general comorbidity (Charlson Index, CCI), cardiovascular event (CVE) during hospitalization, treatment in ICU, mechanical ventilation (MV), degree of lung damage according to CT data, level of prandial glycemia at admission, MHDassociated parameters (vintage, type of vascular access, frequency of complications). The autopsy reports were evaluated for the purpose of lethal structure investigation. In a subgroup treated TCZ the time from symptoms onset to TCZ administration and number of laboratory indicators were evaluated.RESULTS: 53 patients were included, mean age 68 ±9 y, males — 49%. General mortality in observation cohort was 45%, mortality in ICU — 81%, mortality on MV — 95%. High cardiovascular and general comorbidity was revealed (mean CCI — 8,3 ±1,5 points). The causes of outcomes according to autopsy reports data: CVE 37,5% (among them — acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization), severe respiratory failure — 62,5%. The independent predictors of lethal outcome were: MV (OR 106; 95% CI 11,5–984; р <0,001), 3-4 degree of lung damage according to CT data (ОR 6,2; 95% CI 1,803–21,449; р = 0,005), CVE during hospitalization (ОR 18,9; 95% CI 3,631–98,383; р <0,001); CCI ≥10 points (ОR 4,33; 95% CI 1,001–18,767; р = 0,043), level of prandial glycemia at admission ≥10 mmol/l (ОR 10,4; 95% CI 2,726–39,802; р <0,001). For risk identification of upcoming lethal outcome a predictive model was created with the use of discovered RF as variables. The predictive value of this model is 92,45% (positive prognostic value — 96,5%, negative prognostic value — 87,5%).In TCZ treated subgroup the laboratory markers of adverse outcome were detected with application of correlation analysis. Among them: increasing level of CPR 24-48 hours before lethal outcome (r = 0,82), the reduction of lymphocytes count after TCZ administration (r = -0,49), increasing of leukocytes and further reduction of lymphocytes count 24-48 hours before lethal outcome (r = 0,55 и r = -0,52, resp.)).CONCLUSIONS: The number of RF of adverse COVID-19 outcome in patients with T2DM receiving MHD due to DKD are identified. CVE is one of the leading causes of mortality in study cohort. According to our experience the preventive (instead of rescue) strategy of TCZ administration should be used.