Background. More than 80 % of cases ovarian cancer are detected at stage III–IV. One of the most important predictive factors is the cytoreductive surgery without residual tumor. Aim. To determine the selection criteria for cytoreductive surgery in the advanced ovarian cancer patients. Materials and methods. The study included 190 primary IIB–IV stage ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in the oncogynecological department of the N. N. Petrov NMRC on Oncology in the period from August 2017 to August 2020. All patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, chest and abdominal computed tomography, and diagnostic laparoscopy. Assessment of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was performed according to P. Sugarbaker. The outcome of cytoreductive surgery was determined by the size of the residual tumor: complete – without a macroscopically detectable tumor, optimal – residual tumor ≤1 cm, suboptimal – residual tumor ≥1 cm. Results. The complete or optimal cytoreduction achieved in 72.6 % of cases (48.9 % (93 / 190) and 23.7 % (45 / 190), respectively), suboptimal in 22 % (42 / 190) of cases, 5 % (10 / 190) only a diagnostic laparoscopy due to the initial underestimation of the tumor dissemination. In the entire sample PCI value ranged from 0 to 35 points, the median was 4 points (2; 11). In the group of optimal cytoreductions PCI ranged from 0 to 19 points, median – 3 points (2; 6), in the group of suboptimal from 5 to 35 points, median – 19.5 points (15; 23) (p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test). No optimal cytoreduction was performed in PCI >20 points. The optimal cut-off PCI point was 9.5 points (sensitivity 92.1 %, specificity 86.2 %, overall accuracy 87.4 %), if PCI ≤ 9 points – the operation will be hypothetically optimal, if PCI ≥ 10 then hypothetically suboptimal. The main cause of non-optimal interventions (n = 52) were: diffuse carcinomatosis of the small bowel and its mesentery – 73 % (38 / 52), carcinomatosis of the hepatoduodenal zone – 9 % (5 / 52) and a total of 16 % (9 / 52) were other non-resectable tumors (paraaortal, intrathoracic lymph nodes, invasion of the pancreas or pleura, lung metastases). Radiation diagnostic and intraoperative revision were comparable in 60.5 % (115 / 190) of cases. The sensitivity of radiological diagnostic methods in detecting of the small intestine lesions was 23.7 %, the specificity was 90 %, while for laparoscopic diagnostics, the sensitivity in detecting of the small intestine lesions was 93.3 %, and the specificity was 100 %. In assessing of carcinomatosis of the hepatoduodenal zone, the advantage belongs to radiation diagnostic methods: the sensitivity of computed tomography was 66.7 %, the specificity was 97 %, while the sensitivity of diagnostic laparoscopy was 0 %. Conclusions. Determination of a high score in assessing the index of peritoneal carcinomatosis, detection of damage to the hepatoduodenal zone, diagnosed mainly by radiation imaging methods, detection of diffuse lesions of the small intestine, determined mainly by laparoscopic diagnosis reduces the frequency of suboptimal cytoreductive operations from 67 % to 13 %.
Objective: to analyze treatment outcomes in patients with stage IIA–IIIB cervical cancer.Materials and methods. The study included 278 women with stage IIA–IIIB cervical cancer. Study participants were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 165 patients who received chemoradiotherapy + surgery (radical hysterectomy). Patients in group 2 received standard radiotherapy.Results. Patients receiving combination therapy demonstrated better overall and relapse-free survival compared to those receiving standard treatment.Conclusion. Both publications of other authors and our own results suggest high efficacy and safety of combination therapy for stage IIA–IIIB cervical cancer.
Objective: to justify the expediency of the surgical stage as a part of the combination treatment for stage IIA-IIIB cervical cancer. Materials and methods. The study included 343 women with stage IIA-IIIB cervical cancer treated from 2013 to 2016 with mandatory follow-up for at least 2 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 214 patients who received a combination treatment. At the first stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was performed (remote radiation therapy 5 days a week with radio modification with Cisplatin once a week at a dose of 40 mg/m2). After evaluating the effect, patients were subjected to surgical treatment or continued chemoradiotherapy. The second group (n = 129) received standard combined radiation therapy. Various schemes of combination and complex treatment and standard combined radiation therapy were evaluated using the indices of general and relapse-free survival. Results. The proposed scheme for the combination therapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer showed significantly higher survival rates at all the analyzed stages. For the combined treatment group with complete cytoreduction, the two-year overall and relapse-free survival with stage IIA is 94.1% vs. 82.4%, with IIB 90.8% vs. 80.3%, with IIB 87.5% vs. 75%, with IIB with metastatic lesion of regional lymph nodes 85% vs. 70%. For the second group, two-year overall and relapse-free survival with stage IIA 75% vs. 50%, with IIB 70.9% vs. 56.3%, with IIB 59.1% vs. 40.9%, with IIB with metastatic lesion of regional lymph nodes 62.2% and 40.5%. The advantages of this approach are most clearly seen within patients with metastatic lesions of regional lymph nodes (85% vs. 62% accordingly). Conclusion. Cytoreductive surgery in combination with the combination therapy allows to achieve a significant increase in overall and relapse-free survival for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer compared with standard treatment programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.