No abstract

The article shows the peculiarities of the Russian philosophy consideration of the theme of identity, identification, formation of personality. The constructive nature of the research of this topic by Russian thinkers in the context of understanding of man as a unique being who seeks to build himself in accordance with the chosen ideal is noted. It is emphasized that identity is achieved through the awareness of the person of his destiny, understanding of the direct experiences of his own experience, creativity, leading to the acquisition of spirituality. It is noted that the approaches of Shpet, Bakhtin allow us to raise the question of a detailed consideration of ways of self-identification of a person, defining the ways of his formation as a person (through a word, act, sympathetic understanding, dialogue, communication with Others). The act of cognition is considered as a Dialogic process conditioned by the unity, participation, participation of consciousnesses. The approach is proposed based on the ideas born in Russian philosophy, according to which personal development can be interpreted as a process of human identification, identity acquisition, identification of a person as a spiritually integral being, comprehending its uniqueness in the context of culture, in the space of communication with Others.

The trends in the modern educational process related to digitalization, the spread of information and communication technologies, the translation of information into the language of computer programming, the use of graphic visualization techniques, computer graphics are considered. There is a tendency to increase the methodological developments prepared by the pedagogical community, dedicated to techniques, optimization of the translation of a large amount of information. The formation of an open digital educational environment is characterized as a factor of external management of the formation of learning youth. It is emphasized that this trend only partially solves the problem of professional development of young people. It is proved that continuity is possible if translation and inheritance are considered as complementary types of human activity. Inheritance, however, is a multi-level process of human interaction with the surrounding world, affecting the structures of the unconscious, and is meaningful in connection with the implementation of external activities by a person according to the norms and standards set by culture. Such a specific nature of the language makes us doubt the universal possibilities of digitizing the knowledge to be assimilated.

No abstract