OBJECTIVES There is very little evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation versus septal myectomy for a septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of these procedures. METHODS Following propensity score matching, we retrospectively analysed outcomes in 105 patients who underwent myectomy and 105 who underwent septal ablation between 2011 and 2017 at 2 reference centres. RESULTS The mean age was 51.9 ± 14.3 and 52.2 ± 14.3 years in the myectomy and ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.855), and postoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 13 (10–19) mmHg vs 16 (12–26) mmHg; P = 0.025. The 1-year prevalence of the New York Heart Association class III–IV was higher in the ablation group (none vs 6.4%; P = 0.041). The 5-year overall survival rate [96.8% (86.3–99.3) after myectomy and 93.5% (85.9–97.1) after ablation; P = 0.103] and cumulative incidence of sudden cardiac death [0% and 1.9% (0.5–7.5), respectively P = 0.797] did not differ between the groups. The cumulative reoperation rate within 5 years was lower after myectomy than after ablation [2.0% (0.5–7.6) vs 14.6% (8.6–24.1); P = 0.003]. Ablation was associated with a higher reoperation risk (subdistributional hazard ratio = 5.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3–26.3, P = 0.020). At follow-up, left ventricular outflow tract gradient [16 (11–20) vs 23 (15–59) mmHg; P < 0.001] and prevalence of 2+ mitral regurgitation (1.1% vs 10.6%; P = 0.016) were lower after myectomy than after ablation. CONCLUSIONS Both procedures improved functional capacity; however, myectomy better-resolved classes III–IV of heart failure. Septal ablation was associated with higher reoperation rates. Myectomy demonstrated benefits in gradient relief and mitral regurgitation elimination. The results suggest that decreasing rates of myectomy procedures need to be investigated and reconsidered.

No abstract

We analyzed 50 aortic valve replacements (AVR) with Kemerovo-AB-Neo stentless bioprostheses. Mean age was 66.75 (54 to78) years, hospital mortality rate accounted for 2%. The peak transprosthetic pressure gradient (PTPG) in patients operated for aortic stenosis came to 19.57 mm Hg. PTPG was shown to be dependent on the implantation technique; it reached 24.57 mm Hg when in order to fix the proximal line, interrupted sutures were used and ran to 175 mm Hg in the case of running sutures (р = 0.03). Helical CT confirmed fine mobility of the cardiac structures after Kemerovo-AB-Neo implantation: the aortic cross-section area varied up to 84% during the cardiac cycle. It should be noted that AVR with Kemerovo-AB-Neo stentless valves gives good clinical and hemodynamic results early after surgery. A free-hand technique of implantation should be preferred. The implantation of stentless bioprostheses retains cardiac structures mobility and natural aortic root dimensions after performing an AVR.

Carotid stenosis is a multidisciplinary problem that requires the involvement of a specialists’ team, including cardiovascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, endovascular surgeons, cardiologists, neurologists, and internists. In this consensus statement, a group of experts considered the main stages of diagnosing carotid stenosis, as well as discussed, the necessary prevention methods and features of choosing the optimal treatment approach. The aim was to provide concise and structured information on the management of patients with carotid stenosis. This document was developed based on the updated clinical guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Association for Vascular Surgery, taking into account the consensus opinion of Russian experts.

Background We aimed to evaluate early outcomes of septal myectomy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data collected over a 9-year period from 583 patients who underwent septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at our institution. Results The mean age was 55.7 ± 13.1 years, and 338 (58%) patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. There were 11 (1.9%) early deaths, including 3 (0.5%) intraoperative deaths. Early mortality was lowest after isolated septal myectomy (0.8%) and highest after concomitant mitral valve replacement (6.1%). There were 4 (0.7%) and 9 (1.5%) patients with left ventricular wall rupture and ventricular septal defect, respectively, after myectomy. New pacemaker implantation caused by atrioventricular disturbances was required in 29 (5.0%) patients, and was associated with previous alcohol septal ablation (odds ratio 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.02–11.0, P = 0.047). Left ventricular wall rupture, intraoperative residual (15.5% moderate, 0.3% severe) mitral regurgitation, and pre-discharge residual outflow tract gradient >30 mm Hg (4.6%) occurrences were surgeon-dependent. Conclusions The early results are consistent with example targets reported in the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for septal reduction therapy outcomes. Septal myectomy safety and efficacy are surgeon-dependent. Previous alcohol septal ablation increases the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation due to postoperative complete atrioventricular block. Therefore, continuous education, mentoring, and learning by doing may play an important role in achieving reasonable septal myectomy safety and efficacy.