e16063 Background: Cisplatin- and etoposide-based CT allows curing the majority of patients (pts) with metastatic germ cell tumor. There are limited data concerning the importance of maintenance of DI during iCT. In the retrospective study we analyzed the role of DI of iCT on metastatic NSGCT. Methods: 589 chemotherapy-naïve pts with advanced NSGCT received induction iCT from 1987 to 2006 in our center. We compared data of all pts who relapsed after iCT (147 pts) with data of 159 randomly sampled pts without relapses. During iCT all pts received classical E500P (24%) or BE500P (76%) regimens. Median follow-up time was 49 (range, 3–218) months. Eighty four (27.5%) of 306 pts, 107 (35%) and 115 (37.5%) were from good, intermediate and poor prognostic groups, respectively. DI was calculated for every drug and expressed in mg/m2 per week. Multivariate Cox stepwise regression analysis was performed to determine independent prognostic factors in each IGCCCG prognostic group. Progression free survival was used as endpoint of the analysis. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed the following negative prognostic factors as independent: in pts of the IGCCCG good prognostic group: retroperitoneal lymph nodes >5 cm (HR 3.53, 95% Cl 1.66–7.51). In pts with the intermediate prognosis: DI of etoposide <80% (HR 4.73; 95 % CI 4.85–25.04) and presence of pulmonary metastases (HR 0.45, 95% Cl 0.203–0.977). In IGCCCG poor prognostic group: DI of etoposide <80% (HR 1.82, 95% Cl 1.143–2.913). Conclusions: Maintaining a DI of greater then 80% of etoposide during iCT, for the treatment metastatic NSGCT, is one of the crucial factors for pts outcome, particularly in intermediate and poor IGCCCG prognostic groups. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.