Background. Treatment results for the patients with stage II–III triple negative breast cancer (TN BC) have to be improved. Not only the new treatment regimens, but new predictive and prognostic factors should to be developed.Materials and methods. We included 98 patients with stage II–III TN BC in our study. We studied efficacy and safety of PlaTax regimen (cisplatin 75 mg / m2 day 1 + paclitaxel 80 mg / m2 days 1, 8, 15, course every 4 weeks) in this cohort of patients. We assessed pathologic response, survival and factors, which were relevant for predicting response and prognose survival.Results. PlaTax regimen is characterized by high efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Clinical efficacy was 85.8 %, pCR achievement was 60.5 %, tpCR achievement was 58.1 %. The regimen has low haematological toxicity (neutropenia III–IV grades – 4.1 %); the most frequent adverse events were polyneuropathy (18.5 %) and decreased renal function (24.5 %). 3-year progression-free survival was 68.4 %, most of the relapses (92 %) occurred during first 2 years. 3 year overall survival was 77.6 %. The most relevant predictive factor was level of Ki-67 ≥50 % (pCR 38.5 % vs. 68.7 %, p = 0.038). pCR achievement was the most important prognostic factor, resulting in improved 3-year progressionfree survival (44.3 % vs. 89.1 %, p <0.0001), and 3-year overall survival (61.5 % vs. 91.6 %, p = 0.001). Not only the residual disease, but also the size of residual tumor was important from prognostic point of view. Other important prognostic factors were size of the tumor, status of regional lymph nodes, grade. Delay in surgical treatment more than a month lead to decreased 3-year progression-free survival: 87.1 % vs. 62.5 % (p = 0.047).Conclusions. Our data suggest that studied regimen could be an option for patients with stage II–III TN BC. The assessment of the predictive and prognostic factors will help improve the treatment results for patients with stage II–III TN BC.

Breast cancer steadily holds leading market positions in the malignancy morbidity and mortality pattern. The treatment of metastatic breast cancer remains an extremely topical issue, when its aim is not only to prolong the patient’s life, but also to preserve its quality. Due to advances in molecular diagnostics, it has become possible to use several new classes of drugs in recent times. CDK4/6 inhibitors that demonstrate high efficacy in the first-line therapy for luminal metastatic breast cancer is one of these groups. This review presents data from recent registration studies and a description of observations from our own clinical experience.

BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of gastrointestinal tract. The most common sites of metastases are the liver and the peritoneum, whereas breast metastases from GIST are extremely rare. We present a second case of GIST breast metastasis. CASE SUMMARY We found a case of breast metastasis from rectum GIST. A 55-year-old female patient presented with rectum tumor with multiply liver lesions and metastasis in the right breast. Abdominal-perineal extirpation of rectum was performed, histology and immunohistochemistry study showed GIST, mixed type with CD117 and DOG-1 positive staining. The patient was taking imatinib 400 mg for 22 mo with stable disease. Because of growth of the breast metastasis the treatment was changed twice: The dose of imatinib was doubled with further progression in the breast lesion and then the patient was receiving sunitinib for 26 mo with partial response in the right breast and stable disease in the liver lesions. The breast lesion increased and right breast resection was done – surgery on local progression, the liver metastases were stable. Histology and immunohistochemistry studies revealed GIST metastasis, CD 117 and DOG 1 positive with KIT exon 11 mutation. After surgery the patient resumed imatinib. Until now the patient has been taking imatinib 400 mg for 19 mo without progression, last follow up was in November 2022. CONCLUSION GISTs breast metastases are extremely rare, we described the second case. At the same time second primary tumors have been reported frequently in patients diagnosed with GISTs and breast cancer is one of the most common second primary tumors in patients with GISTs. That is why it is very important to distinguish primary from metastatic breast lesions. Surgery on local progression made it possible to resume less toxic treatment.

The consensus on the prevention and correction of rash in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with alpelisib was developed by the experts of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology and dermatovenerologists. PIK3CA mutation is a poor prognostic factor for HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Alpelisib demonstrates efficacy in patients with PIK3CA mutation, but treatment might be associated with adverse events that include rash. All-grade rash was reported in 35.6% patients in SOLAR-1 trial (n=284). According to the published real-world data, for Russian population (n=19) all-grade rash was reported for 37% patients. The consensus contains practical recommendation on management of patients with rash of different grade.