The term "office" has long since become one of the most common characteristics of the 21st century economy. Everyone has offices, from a construction organization to an advertising company, from a huge factory with thousands of employees to a small firm with barely ten employees. The functioning of the office is one way or another expenses, and they are very diverse, which determines certain accounting features of them. The article reveals and highlights the specific features of office expenses that must be taken into account when forming an accounting policy, which will allow for the formation of a fairly rational accounting system. These features are: the specifics of regulatory regulation, the significant share of office expenses in total expenses, the variety of these expenses, special approaches to their qualification. It is noted that the office building can be accounted for as one object of fixed assets, or as a set of individual objects of fixed assets or low-value non-current material assets. It is emphasized that the office building can be divided into several objects during its operation. As for office stationery, here the order of displaying costs for its purchase in accounting depends on the term of its operation. Computers, printers, faxes, telephones and other equipment of a similar nature are usually integral attributes of any office. All of them belong to classic non-current assets, as they are operated for more than one year. Their accounting largely depends on their value and on the accounting policy of the business entity. Tax accounting of income tax for office expenses mostly does not contain special nuances. Differences with large payers can arise mostly, either in the case of fixed assets or intangible assets, or if there was an acquisition from risky counterparties. There is no doubt about the economic nature of office expenses. The exception is the so-called dual-purpose equipment, for example: refrigerators, kettles, microwave ovens, coffee makers, heaters, air conditioners, as well as various decorative objects, for example: flowers, trees, aquariums with fish, green spaces.

In the process of studying the methodological approaches used in assessing the tax burden, it was concluded that it is advisable to use a comprehensive assessment of tax costs in their relationship with tax-dependent places of expenditure, cost centers and responsibilities that cause tax liabilities, and this allows us to expand the cognitive value of the analysis of the profitability of different species. The lack of direct interdependence of the tax burden of enterprises as economic entities with the objects of management accounting in the accounting system leads to the inability to analyze the level and optimize the amount of tax expenditures. In this regard, the identification and justification of the principles of selection in the management accounting of objects of responsibility for tax costs that arise, allows to increase the informativeness of management accounting for these costs and establish the relationship between specific taxes and centers of responsibility for tax base formation. The article highlights the peculiarities of the formation of information on tax expenditures, which make it possible to model the accounting mechanism for the tax burden in the management accounting system. Selected accounting and analytical indicators that directly or indirectly affect the amount of tax payments and are interrelated with the functional responsibility of managers at different levels. The peculiarities of the distribution of tax expenses between the objects of management accounting are revealed, in which each of the objects of management is the object of accounting and assumes part of the tax cost. A typical mechanism for obtaining accounting data for managing tax expenditures from financial accounting data using accounting methods is considered. The study of management accounting methods in relation to the tax burden of the enterprise has influenced the search for new forms of evaluation of the results of accounting for tax expenditures in order to apply them in the analysis of tax costs. The existence of interrelation between accounting entries, which reflect the accrual of taxes in financial accounting, with the analytical features of management tax accounting. As a result of the use of accounts and double entry, the information resource obtained on the basis of primary documents is sent to an independent system of administrative accounts.

The article examines the mechanisms of tax incentives for innovation of economic entities, which should focus on the development of national production and ensure sustainable macroeconomic growth. It was found that the main problems of the domestic economy, which create barriers to its innovative renewal, are the weak links between science and industry, lack of demand from industry and research and development, very low level of technical equipment of the economy, lack of market motivation for the development of knowledge-intensive production, worn-out equipment and, as a result, low efficiency of the economy as a whole. It is proved that among the main reasons for the reduction of budget revenues in the economy of Ukraine, in addition to the crisis, there are also tax benefits. For certain areas of business, this is one of the most attractive types of government support, as it means that some businesses are starting to pay less taxes. The rest, respectively, must be paid by other business structures or the state receives less money to finance its expenditures. As a result, inequality between taxpayers and a simultaneous reduction in the amount of funds that can be collected by the Ministry of Finance. Thus, in 2019 alone, due to the provision of tax benefits, the state budget did not receive budget revenues equivalent to 1.3 billion US dollars. Total budget losses from this source during 2015-2019 amounted to 6.4 billion dollars. It was found that in Ukraine there is almost no system for monitoring the impact of tax benefits, and this does not allow to assess the future effect of the introduction of such measures. Of course, this has important negative consequences for both public finances and the economy as a whole. The influence of granting tax benefits on the loss of state budget revenues is analyzed. Specific measures aimed at tax incentives for the development of innovation in Ukraine, the introduction of innovations by economic entities of all sizes are proposed. The need to rethink the criteria for granting tax benefits is noted. Foreign practice of tax incentives for innovation and investment activities, the cost of innovation is time-tested and quite diverse. Undoubtedly, it can be useful in the development of this area of tax incentives in Ukraine.

Стаття присвячена актуальним проблемам оцінки податкового потенціалу великих платників податків, які обумовлені, з одного боку існуючими потребами бюджетно-податкової політики, а з іншого – вдосконаленням податкового адміністрування в Україні. Такий взаємозв'язок визначається суттєвістю впливу податкового потенціалу великих платників податків на бюджетну забезпеченість держави як взагалі, так і її адміністративно-територіальних одиниць, зокрема. Наявна невизначеність податкового законодавства в поєднанні з економічними реаліями призводить до виникнення податкових ризиків, як на рівні держави, так і на рівні платників податків, що негативно впливає на розвиток податкового потенціалу. Це обумовлено багато в чому тим, що сучасною фінансовою наукою досі не розроблені нові наукові підходи до оцінки податкового потенціалу, її інструментарій також недостатньо розвинутий, потребують розвитку механізми управління податковими ризиками. В даній статті зроблено спробу цю прогалину заповнити.

No abstract