In spite of vaccination was recommended by the World Health Organization, the main strategy of influenza is antiviral drugs treatment, one of which is umifenovir. Aim. The aim of the study is to obtain additional data on safety and therapeutic efficacy of the antiviral drug Arbidol (umifenovir) in patients with a diagnosis of influenza and common cold. Materials and methods. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study investigating efficacy and safety of Arbidol (umifenovir) in Treatment and Prophylaxis of Influenza and Common Cold (ARBITR) IV phase started in November 2011 and completed in April 2016 on the basis of 15 research centers in various regions of the Russian Federation. A total of 359 patients, aged 18 to 65 years with influenza or acute respiratory tract infection, of no more than 36 hours' duration were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: a group of patients (therapy group) treated by Arbidol (umifenovir) at a dosage of 800 mg/day (2 capsules) for 5 days (n=181), and a group of patients receiving placebo 4 times a day for 5 days (n=178). The primary outcome measures of the study were the duration of clinical illness among patients with common cold and influenza/ARVI, the duration and severity of the main symptoms. Number of clinical complications associated with influenza and common cold was assessed as a secondary outcome. Safety was assessed by analyzing number of adverse events that are probably or definitely related to Arbidol, assessing vital signs, examining the physical condition of patients and general clinical laboratory parameters. Results. In the group treated by umifenovir, the number of full recover patients on the 4th day from the disease onset were significantly differed from the number of such cases in the placebo group. The number of cases of complete recovery after 96 hours was 98 patients (54.1%) and 77 (43.3%), p

The FRs for influenza and ARVI complications are patient's age (children under 3 years of age and adults older than 65 years), the presence of chronic somatic diseases, and pregnancy. Patients with endocrine, eating, metabolic (including obesity), circulatory, and respiratory disorders are at high risk for influenza and ARVI complications. Umifenovir therapy substantially reduces the duration of fever and risk of complications, especially in patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection.

Aim. The study evaluates clinical effectiveness and safety of etiotropic antiviral medications with a direct mechanism of action (Riamilovir, Ribavirin, Umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults. Materials and methods. The study used the data from 59 health records of patients with moderate PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Control group included 29 patients treated with 1250 mg Riamilovir off-label per day for 5 days (250 mg 5 times a day), comparison group consisted of 30 patients, who received 800 mg Ribavirin and Umifenovir per day for 5 days. The effectiveness of the medications was assessed by the duration and severity of general infectious and respiratory syndromes, anosmia and ageusia, as well as the oxygen content in the blood, the timing of SARS-COV-2 virus elimination from the body according to the results of control studies of nasopharyngeal swabs using the PCR method and dynamics of blood tests results. Results. A statistically significant decrease in the duration of fever, cough, and anosmia and a more rapid elimination of the virus from the body were noted in the group of patients receiving Riamilovir. Decreased levels of non-specific inflammatory markers in blood serum, as well as normal values of liver enzymes were observed in control group during therapy, as opposed to the comparison group. No serious adverse events were noted when using the medication. Conclusion. Nucleoside analogue medication Riamilovir showed good effectiveness and safety profile in adult patients with moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Elderly above 60 years old are more interested in getting vaccinated against influenza and are the group with the higher administration percentage, in 2016-2017 season was 68,4% while in 2017-2018 season reached 69%. A positive trend was noticed on the vaccination coverage for health care workers from 60% in 2016-2017 to 72% in 2017-2018 season.Conclusion: During the last three years there is an increase commitment on influenza vaccination from government and other partners. Nevertheless, there is still need to keep influenza vaccination, among the priorities within the health agenda. The administration of influenza vaccine among target risk groups has been increased but remains very low among them due to lack of access to the vaccine. Meanwhile the well-functioning government influenza vaccination program of health care workers is showing good results.

The aim of the study was to carry out a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in order to combine the results of clinical trials on Triazavirin® (Riamilovir) efficacy in etiotropic therapy of influenza.Materials and methods. The analysis was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA principles regarding the quality of information presentation on the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of works assessing medical interventions. The study included 471 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of influenza (with laboratory confirmed presence of influenza virus antigens).Results. The conducted meta-analysis showed that the use of Triazavirin® (Riamilovir) has a statistically significant effect on the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with influenza, therefore Riamilovir can be used in the initial therapy of adult patients with influenza.Conclusion. Clinical studies have shown that the use of Triazavirin® (Riamilovir) is effective both in the initial and late stages of the disease, and therefore Riamilovir can be used in the treatment of adult patients with respiratory diseases of viral etiology, in particular, those diagnosed with influenza. The meta-analysis of the collected data showed that therapy with Triazavirin® (Riamilovir) has statistically significant advantages in various aspects both in comparison with the placebo group and with the Tamiflu® (Oseltamivir) group.