Aim. To compare the results of surgical treatment using bipolar hemostasis and traditional ligation of ligaments and blood vessels in vaginal hysterectomy.Material and methods. Fifty patients with benign uterine disease underwent vaginal hysterectomy using electrosurgery (n = 29) or conventional suture ligation (n = 21 controls).Results. Postoperative pain (especially on the fi rst day) was decreased in the electrosurgery group (5.50 ± 1.43 VAS points) as compared to the control group (7.64 ± 0.58 points), p < 0.001. Intraoperative blood loss was signifi cantly lower in electrosurgery group (82.86 ± 22.58 ml) than in the control group (226.36 ± 129.12 ml), p < 0.001. Operating time was signifi cantly shorter in the main group than in the controls (65.36 ± 20.9 min vs. 86.59 ± 40.19 min, p < 0.05). On average, 2.75 ± 1.11 suture packages were used with bipolar coagulation, 6.00 ± 1.93 in the controls (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was similar for both groups. Adverse event rates did not differ signifi cantly.Conclusions. Bipolar coagulation with the TissueSeal Plus proved to be more effi cient or identical to traditional suture ligation. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain and the duration of the operation were less, while the complications were identical for both groups. In addition, bipolar coagulation was easier to use and cost effective. These fi ndings prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of electrosurgical techniques to perform hysterectomy and its further study

In recent studies, it has been established that extralevator abdominoperineal extirpation (ELAPE) of the rectum can improve the oncological results of treatment of distal rectal cancer compared to standard abdominoperineal extirpation. As a result of extralevator dissection, a large defect of the perineum is formed, which requires plastic closure. While performing ELAPE, the structures that form the pelvic diaphragm are affected. This increases the risk of pelvic organ prolapse in women and significantly affects the quality of life of these patients, which requires subsequent surgical treatment. Despite the fact that pelvic organ prolapse develops as a consequence of previous surgical treatment by an oncologist, they do not consider it as a complication in the long-term postoperative period. Such patients are not referred to the operating gynecologist. Currently, this problem is poorly understood and there are no standardized approaches to the surgical treatment of pelvic prolapse in this category of patients.

This article presents a review of the current literature on the problem of omission and prolapse of the internal genitalia in women. Patients diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse need pelvic floor plastic surgery. Currently, in spite of the extensive experience in managing this category of patients, there is still no single and unambiguous approach to the choice of surgical treatment tactics. This review describes the latest information on the etiopathogenesis of pelvic floor supporting apparatus lesions, namely, systemic connective tissue dysplasia as the main development factor. Prospective development of genetic and immunohistochemical marker diagnosis is the key to individual selection of treatment options for this multidisciplinary problem. The results of interventions are characterized by extreme variability in terms of both effectiveness and the frequency of intra- and postoperative complications. The treatment of rare forms of prolapse after surgery for rectal cancer also raises many questions. The current multitude of types of surgical interventions for genital prolapse and variants of pelvic floor defect closure is constantly being modified. To date, there is no universal treatment option, and all available techniques have both advantages and disadvantages, as well as limited application due to the risk of somatic complications, high recurrence rate, and the need for expensive equipment and a highly qualified surgeon. New research is needed, taking into account the current knowledge about the cellular and molecular mechanism of the lesion of the pelvic floor supporting apparatus. All of this will improve the methods of correction of pelvic organ prolapse in both typical and rare forms caused by iatrogenic factors. As a result, this may lead to an improvement in the quality of life of such patients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the morphometric features of tissues after exposure to bipolar energy of various electrosurgical generators and surgical hemostatic instruments used in vaginal hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 48 individuals who underwent a vaginal hysterectomy. The patients were divided in three groups based on the instrument used for sealing blood vessels: a BiClamp was applied in Group 1 (n = 16), a TissueSeal PLUS COMFORT in Group 2 (n = 16), and a Thunderbeat in Group 3 (n = 16). The maximum temperature of tissue measured using a Fluke FLK TIS 40 9HZ thermal imaging infrared camera was compared within the groups. RESULTS: The maximum tissue temperature between the branches on electroligation, the minimum tissue temperature, and the tissue temperature at the coagulation boundary were significantly lower when using a TissueSeal PLUS COMFORT clamp than when using BiClamp and Thunderbeat clamps (H value = 41.8, p 0.01). Morphometric parameters (prevalence, coagulation depth and area) were the smallest with a TissueSeal PLUS COMFORT clamp compared to other clamps. CONCLUSIONS: Using a TissueSeal PLUS COMFORT clamp during vaginal hysterectomy is effective and safe and has the best thermometric and morphometric characteristics when applied to the tissue, thereby reducing the risk of lateral thermal damage. The possibility of perifocal heat transfer varies with the type of tool and with the temperature at the coagulation boundary.

No abstract