Introduction. The article is devoted to the relations of language, education system and man. The identification of the ontological status of language and education is closely related to their nature and the nature of man as a constantly becoming being. Language is defined as a fundamental condition for the existence of the education system.Materials and methods. The philosophical and pedagogical research used understanding approaches in education, the article is based on the analysis of classical and modern works on the philosophy of language and philosophy of education. Philosophical research has a hermeneutic and existential Foundation, presented in the works of the largest German thinkers M. Heidegger and H.-G. Gadamer. Hermeneutic methodology in the study is combined with dialectical approach.Result. The process of understanding in the framework of hermeneutical methodology appears as a way of being a person and the purpose of the education system. Language appears both as a fact of being (a metaphysical phenomenon) and as a phenomenon of culture. It is proved that the object of philosophical research at the border of philosophy of language and education should be primarily the position of the classics, whose works are devoted to the problem of philosophy of language (M. Heidegger, H.-G. Gadamer, G. G. Shpet, A. F. Losev, A. N. Portnov, F. Kaints, etc.). It is concluded that society needs silence, man-made civilization has created a world of "noise" technology, all fell into the age of digitalization. Both teachers and students are unaccustomed to silence, do not know how and do not want to listen to it.Discussion and conclusion. The article considers the active role of language (language is initiative) in the existence of culture, the importance of language as a fact of existence for human existence. The ontological status of language and the existential concept of education are deduced within the framework of pedagogical hermeneutics.

This article deals with the problem of digitalization of cultural mechanisms of knowledge translation. The study clarifies the terms digitization and digitalization, considers their comparison, as well as differences from digital technologies. In addition, the positive and negative consequences of these processes on society as a whole are considered. Since a modern person prefers to receive information in a finished form, therefore, digitalization is of great importance. The history of the emergence of digitalization as a separate process is also considered. Now most areas of our lives increase technological involvement, that has led to a large-scale convergence of various areas and processes. The article examines the influence of convergence on the processes of social and political integration at the level of interaction between groups, associations of individuals in the implementation of civil initiatives, as well as at the level of states and peoples. Digitalization processes have significantly changed the world and human interaction.

Introduction. The problem of professional identity in modern socio-cultural conditions continues to be relevant and requires a non-surface, non-structural methodological and anthropological rethinking. The purpose of the article is to determine the role of the tandem of philosophical anthropology and philosophy of education in creating the ground for the formation of professional identity.Materials and Methods. The methodological principle of historicism is fundamental. The research methodology includes hermeneutical and systemic methods. The analysis and generalization of scientific research works on the philosophy of education and philosophical anthropology were also used.Results. A person from different metaphysical positions thinks about the issues of his own identity, his career aspirations and professional orientation. Modern society creates an environment for the development of an “informed person”, who is immersed in fundamentally different spheres of life. Philosophical anthropology in modern conditions acts as a practice of self-knowledge, the result of which should be contact with oneself, understanding one's goals and aspirations. The philosophy of education comprehends the trends of modern education, calls for a critical attitude to the newly created concepts of man, culture, and education. Professional identity gives an understanding and a sense of one's own "I" in professional development. Therefore, the task of the philosophy of education and philosophical anthropology is to harmonize the process of self-identification as much as possible. The tandem of the philosophy of education and philosophical anthropology reconciles the individual with the fundamental incompleteness of his being, looking for ways of harmonious development in the conditions of constant choice, constant search for his identity.Discussion and Conclusions. The task of both philosophers and educators is to create all the necessary conditions for the younger generation to cope with the challenge of the new era. Modern man needs not just to accumulate information about the world; he needs to know life itself: he wants to ask questions about its meaning, to see the boundaries of his own self, to talk about freedom and necessity, love and fidelity, understanding and loneliness. The relevance of philosophical anthropology lies in the fact that it acts as an arbiter between andragogy and pedagogy in a dialogue with the philosophy of education, since it asserts the main subject of a Person regardless of his social circumstances.