Microfinance Investment Funds 2006
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-28071-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most customers prefer individual loans, as they do not want to be obligated to others when moving forward and due to the reputation of the solidarity group lending approach (e.g. bearing the responsibility for others, social sanctions, frustration due to too many meetings, or dealing with sanction for save borrowers who happen to be in risky or bad groups) [24][25][26][27][28]. However IMFs also have a share of responsibility for the abandonment to some extent: in times of crisis they have strongly encouraged the development of the individual loans and relaxed on customer screening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most customers prefer individual loans, as they do not want to be obligated to others when moving forward and due to the reputation of the solidarity group lending approach (e.g. bearing the responsibility for others, social sanctions, frustration due to too many meetings, or dealing with sanction for save borrowers who happen to be in risky or bad groups) [24][25][26][27][28]. However IMFs also have a share of responsibility for the abandonment to some extent: in times of crisis they have strongly encouraged the development of the individual loans and relaxed on customer screening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lieberman (2009) argued that MFIs going to the public would create new opportunities for their clients. Kohn (2006) argued that MFIs services might lead to the commercialization of services if it moved to identify the capital market trends. The past researchers focus on both the positive and negative sides of MFIs in going towards capital infusion from the public.…”
Section: Knowledge Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De plus, de par leur taille d'investisseurs institutionnels, les MIVs pourraient être les seuls à pouvoir facilement supporter les coûts de contrôle étendus nécessaires pour s'assurer que les dirigeants agissent bien dans l'intérêt de la mission de l'IMF (Labie, 2003). Mais à l'opposé, lorsque des investisseurs strictement commerciaux entrent dans le capital d'une IMF en tant qu'actionnaires majoritaires, des doutes peuvent être émis quant au maintien de la mission sociale (Köhn et Jainzik, 2007).…”
Section: Les Choix De Financement 3 Et La Gouvernanceunclassified