Cross Diels-Alder reactions between 2-carbomethoxy-l,3-butadiene 1 and electron-rich dienes were carried out. It was found that diene 1 had a higher reactivity than even the well-known Danishefsky diene in its Diels-Alder cycloaddition with electron-deficient dienophiles. In addition, (Z)-1-methylthio-3-carbomethoxy-l,3-butadiene 11 was found to have a higher reactivity than (Z)-I-methylthio-l,3-butadiene and (3-2-carbomethoxy-1,3-hexadiene, while both (a-and The facile dimerization of 2-carbomethoxy-l,3-butadiene 1 to give dimethyl mikanecate 4 has been known for some time (Scheme 1) (1, 2). Although the unusual ease with which this [4+2] cycloaddition takes place has been noted, a rationalization of this phenomenon has yet to be offered. A recent communication by Jung and Zimmerman provided the first kinetic data on this dimerization (3). They proposed that the high dienophilic character of the C1-C2 bond in 1 and the possibility that 1 may be more stable in its E-(s-cis) conformation could be major factors in accelerating this Diels-Alder reaction. W e provide evidence herein that another electronic factor plays a significant role in the rate acceleration of this dimerization and that in fact 1 should be regarded as an electronically activated diene.A 96% yield of dimer 4 was obtained by heating sulfolene 2 at 1 10°C (Scheme 1, method A) ( l a ) or by treating allylic bromide 3 with base at 25°C (Method B) ( I b). However, in the presence of the electron-rich diene 5 a (Y = Me) (4) and the very reactive diene 5 b (Y = OMe) (4b), either method led to a mixture of dimer 4 and cross cycloadduct 6 (Table 1). In most cases, the dimerization product prevailed unless a large excess of the electron-rich diene was used. Note that the lower temperature seems to favor dimerization over cross-cycloaddition (entries 3 , 4 , 5, and 8). These results indicate that diene 1 , as a dienophile, cycloadds more rapidly to itself, an electron-deficient diene, than it does to the electron-rich dienes 5 a and 5b. Note that the reactivity of diene 1 is underestimated here since diene 1 is generated slowly (3-4 h) and must be at low concentration relative to the other diene. W e ruled out the possibility of a local concentration effect, where molecules of diene 1 would dimerize faster because they were generated in proximity to one another, by stirring 1 equivalent each of sulfolene 2 and diene 5 b with '~u t h o r to whom correspondence may be addressed. excess methyl acrylate (10 equiv.) in refluxing toluene (Scheme 2). After 4 h, diene 1 had reacted completely to give 7 and Danishefsky's diene 5 b had reacted to the extent of 93% to give adduct 8 (gc analysis). Also detected were 6 b (<5%) and 4 (traces). Control experiments in which each diene was reacted separately with excess methyl acrylate confirmed that diene 1 reacted more rapidly with methyl acrylate than did Danishefsky's diene 56. We believe that diene 1 reacted as soon as it was generated since it (or dimer 4) was not detected in significant amount throughout the reactio...