2003
DOI: 10.1049/el:20030532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.42 µm continuous-wave operation of GaInNAs laser diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CW slope efficiency was 0.34 W=A, corresponding to a 40% external quantum efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, these are the best threshold current density and efficiency data ever reported for a dilute-nitride laser in this wavelength range [6,7]. Additionally, devices showed maximum CW output powers of $30 mW before thermal rollover and pulsed output powers (5 ms pulse and 1% duty cycle) as high as 300 mW.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CW slope efficiency was 0.34 W=A, corresponding to a 40% external quantum efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, these are the best threshold current density and efficiency data ever reported for a dilute-nitride laser in this wavelength range [6,7]. Additionally, devices showed maximum CW output powers of $30 mW before thermal rollover and pulsed output powers (5 ms pulse and 1% duty cycle) as high as 300 mW.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1), these devices are more temperature sensitive. The characteristic temperature (T o ) under pulsed conditions was 62K as measured from 25 to 60 C. This is likely due to reduced electron confinement in GaInNAsSb=GaNAs structures as compared to GaInNAs=GaAs [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GaInNAs(Sb) edge-emitting lasers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSEL) [11][12][13][14][15], and distributed feedback (DFB) lasers [16][17], grown monolithically on GaAs, have been demonstrated throughout the 1.2-1.6µm telecommunication bandwidth. They have several advantages over InP based devices: a larger conduction band offset which reduces temperature sensitivity and enhances differential gain, higher index contrast which decreases the necessary number of mirror pairs in distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) for VCSELs, native oxide apertures for current confinement, and lower cost wafers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, QDs are most widely studied in the GaAsbased materials system, and InAs/ GaAs QD lasers have been realized in the 1.3 m wavelength region 4,5 and close to 1.55 m with metamorphic QDs, 6 which was also achieved by dilute-N GaInNAs and GaInNAsSb quantum wells ͑QWs͒. 7,8 On the other hand, the InP-based materials system easily covers the full range of optical-networking wavelengths dominant for photonic devices in the 1.55 m wavelength region employing bulk and QW active regions. Moreover, it is ideally suited for monolithic photonic integration, supporting all key optical functions, including lasers, SOAs, phase modulators, detectors, and passive waveguides on a single chip.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%