2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01283-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
123
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
123
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The suppressive effect of 1 Hz rTMS on cortical excitability has been used to induce a temporary cortical dysfunction in healthy subjects (Kosslyn et al, 1999;Hilgetag et al, 2001;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Knecht et al, 2003) or, presumably by normalizing increased levels of excitability, to induce beneficial effects in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders (Klein et al, 1999;Siebner et al, 1999b;Tergau et al, 1999;Brighina et al, 2003;Hoffman et al, 2003). Here, we found that preconditioning with cathodal TDCS can flip the "normal" suppressive effect of 1 Hz rTMS and cause an apparently paradoxical facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The suppressive effect of 1 Hz rTMS on cortical excitability has been used to induce a temporary cortical dysfunction in healthy subjects (Kosslyn et al, 1999;Hilgetag et al, 2001;Muellbacher et al, 2002;Knecht et al, 2003) or, presumably by normalizing increased levels of excitability, to induce beneficial effects in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders (Klein et al, 1999;Siebner et al, 1999b;Tergau et al, 1999;Brighina et al, 2003;Hoffman et al, 2003). Here, we found that preconditioning with cathodal TDCS can flip the "normal" suppressive effect of 1 Hz rTMS and cause an apparently paradoxical facilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Several studies have used this approach, and it has been shown to be effective in both motor and non-motor deficits. For example, inhibitory rTMS to the non-lesioned parietal cortex can induce long-lasting improvements in symptoms of spatial neglect (Brighina et al 2003;Shindo et al 2006). In the motor region, Grefkes and colleagues showed that inhibitory rTMS applied over contralesional M1 of patients with subacute stroke significantly improved motor performance of the affected hand (Grefkes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been reported that low-frequency rTMS is able to improve hemispatial neglect and nonfluent aphasia by the transient functional disruption of the corresponding area in the unaffected hemisphere, a phenomenon provisionally called paradoxical functional facilitation (Oliveri et al, 1999;Brighina et al, 2003;Martin et al, 2004). Moreover, other authors found similar paradoxical improvements in performances of hand movements or memory encoding after low-frequency rTMS over motor cortex or ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Kobayashi et al, 2004;Kahn et al, 2005).…”
Section: Functional Role Of the Right Pitcmentioning
confidence: 91%