2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12600-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1-year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse prevention treatment for heroin dependence in Sweden: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
244
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
244
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings in this study of significant superiority of buprenorphine compared to placebo on all of our primary drug use outcome measures and retention are consistent with the results of other placebo-controlled studies of buprenorphine in the U.S., 18,20,23 Norway 22 and Sweden. 21 The findings of significant superiority of buprenorphine compared to naltrexone for retention and time to resuming heroin use are unique. The results for buprenorphine treated patients in this study regarding retention and maximum duration of opioid abstinence are similar to previous studies of buprenorphine, 19 and the results for naltrexone treated patients were comparable to the results of many studies, 24,33,34 suggesting that the findings regarding the greater efficacy of buprenorphine compared to naltrexone or placebo may generalize to other populations and settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings in this study of significant superiority of buprenorphine compared to placebo on all of our primary drug use outcome measures and retention are consistent with the results of other placebo-controlled studies of buprenorphine in the U.S., 18,20,23 Norway 22 and Sweden. 21 The findings of significant superiority of buprenorphine compared to naltrexone for retention and time to resuming heroin use are unique. The results for buprenorphine treated patients in this study regarding retention and maximum duration of opioid abstinence are similar to previous studies of buprenorphine, 19 and the results for naltrexone treated patients were comparable to the results of many studies, 24,33,34 suggesting that the findings regarding the greater efficacy of buprenorphine compared to naltrexone or placebo may generalize to other populations and settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of direct comparisons may contribute to policy makers' assumption that there are no advantages to introducing opioid agonist maintenance treatment (and continued prohibition of this treatment) if naltrexone maintenance treatment is available. Additionally, there are relatively few placebo-controlled clinical trials of either buprenorphine 18,[20][21][22][23] or naltrexone maintenance. 8,[11][12][13]24 Consequently, this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy for maintaining heroin abstinence, preventing relapse, and reducing HIV risk behaviors following detoxification of 24 weeks of drug counseling alone (combined with placebo) or combined with maintenance with naltrexone or buprenorphine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a very high rate of premature death among patients after discontinuities of opiates. [8][9][10] vii. Long-acting endorphin agonist (methadone, buprenorphine intramuscular heroin) has been standard treatment for addiction to opiates.…”
Section: Complex Evidence Of Antidepressant and Mood Altering Propertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buprenorphine mono-product, under the trade name Subutex, has been available for some time in other countries, notably in France since 1996 and in Australia since 2002. The bulk of clinical research supporting the approval of buprenorphine and the buprenorphinenaloxone combination has been conducted by US investigators, although other studies in Europe [36][37][38] and Australia [39] add to the weight of evidence for its clinical efficacy and safety. Some of the more crucial studies have been summarized in the Cochrane reviews [16].…”
Section: Clinical Studies Of Efficacy and Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%