2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower tendency of use of DESs in the low-SES group observed in our study has also been reported in American cohorts ( 30 32 ), which is a “treatment-risk paradox” in which higher-risk patients are not treated with optimal or evidence-based strategies, and the use of mechanical support devices is reduced, and it may result in prognosis worsening ( 19 , 33 , 34 ). This finding may reflect the fact that differences in outcomes may not only be related to the use of a specific treatment/device in the acute period but to a whole standardized medical approach in which access to secondary prevention may be of utmost importance ( 35 ) and that the health system may override the burden of higher risk subsets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The lower tendency of use of DESs in the low-SES group observed in our study has also been reported in American cohorts ( 30 32 ), which is a “treatment-risk paradox” in which higher-risk patients are not treated with optimal or evidence-based strategies, and the use of mechanical support devices is reduced, and it may result in prognosis worsening ( 19 , 33 , 34 ). This finding may reflect the fact that differences in outcomes may not only be related to the use of a specific treatment/device in the acute period but to a whole standardized medical approach in which access to secondary prevention may be of utmost importance ( 35 ) and that the health system may override the burden of higher risk subsets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In terms of long follow-up, recently, the EXAMINATION-EXTEND (10-Years Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial) study demonstrated the superiority of CoCr-EES ( N = 751) in combined patient- and device-oriented composite endpoints, compared with BMS ( N = 747), in patients with STEMI (patient-oriented composite endpoint: 32.4% vs. 38.0%, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.96, p = 0.013; device-oriented composite endpoint: 13.6% vs. 18.4%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55–0.93, p = 0.012, respectively) [ 139 ]. These results were driven mainly by TLR (5.7% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.018).…”
Section: Practical Recommendation For Primary Pcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapamycin-eluting stents, the most common, currently used DES, have been found to be highly efficacious and significantly reduces the risk of restenosis and target lesion revascularization after angioplasty. 23,24 Interestingly, rapamycin is a natural macrocyclic compound that was initially isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. 25 Previous studies demonstrated that rapamycin can inhibit the mTOR signaling pathway and regulate cell cycle-related proteins, resulting in a cell-cycle arrest between the G1 to S transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%