2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114214
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

100% renewable wastewater treatment plants: Techno-economic assessment using a modelling and optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional activated sludge (CAS), still the most common technology for biological WW remediation [14], struggles to treat P&P WW up to the required standards for effluent discharge or reuse. CAS is characterized as well by high energy costs for tank aeration [15]. To solve these issues, alternative solutions have been proposed for secondary P&P WW treatment, such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs) [14], sequential batch reactors (SBRs), anaerobic filters, and aerated lagoons [16], each one with advantages and downsizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional activated sludge (CAS), still the most common technology for biological WW remediation [14], struggles to treat P&P WW up to the required standards for effluent discharge or reuse. CAS is characterized as well by high energy costs for tank aeration [15]. To solve these issues, alternative solutions have been proposed for secondary P&P WW treatment, such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs) [14], sequential batch reactors (SBRs), anaerobic filters, and aerated lagoons [16], each one with advantages and downsizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy is the main operating cost of wastewater treatment. The North American Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) consume approximately 1-4% of the total energy production, and in Europe, the consumption is approximately 1% [1,2]. A financed project in the north of Portugal [3] identified the main energy consumers: the aeration equipment associated with biological treatment (58%), inlet pumping (9%), deodorization (8%) and sludge treatment equipment (6%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy savings in WWTPs have been investigated in recent decades, but information on their operating costs is still scarce in the literature [4]. The focus is being placed on process optimization, rather than on cost-saving [2,5]. There is still a need for more information regarding nutrient removal, polishing treatments and operational costs of nature-based wastewater treatment technologies, as noted in studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane (CH 4 ) is also an excellent potential energy delivery material but it can contribute to GHG emission, due to its carbon content, unless generated via a renewable energy conversion process [11,12]. A significant advantage of CH 4 as an energy carrier is the efficient and advanced storage and transport pipeline system developed for natural gas, the fossil and thus less environmentally friendly form of CH 4 [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%