2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781849208499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

100 Statistical Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
240
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
240
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Kendall's coefficient of rank correlation t (Kanji, 1999), which was used to quantify the agreement between the simulated and estimated from EC measurements seasonal patterns of GPP. The Kendall coefficient measured the tendency coherence between predicted and observed GPP by comparing the ranks assigned to successive pairs.…”
Section: Nonlinear Optimization and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Kendall's coefficient of rank correlation t (Kanji, 1999), which was used to quantify the agreement between the simulated and estimated from EC measurements seasonal patterns of GPP. The Kendall coefficient measured the tendency coherence between predicted and observed GPP by comparing the ranks assigned to successive pairs.…”
Section: Nonlinear Optimization and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide an aggregated perspective on the performance of the Diff extension against the other methods, we employ the Friedman's test for multiple achievements of multiple subjects [15] on the best-of-run fitness. The p-value 1.41 × 10 −9 strongly indicates that at least one method performs significantly different from the remaining ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although marginal reduction in the counts was obtained with the augmented cost compared to PCC or MSD alone, significant reduction was obtained compared to those of MI or NMI alone. To obtain a measure of the statistical significance of reduction in the counts for the augmented costs (i.e., AMI and ANMI), we performed the paired t-test with onetail at the 95% confidence level against other costs [Kanji et al 1993]. The registration results using AMI were found to be better than those of MSD, MI, and NMI significantly (P=0.0086, 0.0027, and 0.0035) and so were the results using ANMI (P=0.0068, 0.0021, and 0.0027).…”
Section: D3 Two-mentioning
confidence: 99%