2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

108. Comparison of Metal-on-Metal to Metal-on-Polyethylene Material Combinations for Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty Under Walking Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regardless of design and material combination, these devices are expected to wear and produce particulate debris over the course of their expected lifetime. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Throughout its over 40-year history, the survivorship of total joint arthroplasty has been limited primarily by the generation of wear debris and its subsequent biologic sequela; aseptic loosening caused by a wear particle-mediated infl ammation and osteolytic cascade. 8,9 Therefore, given that the expected lifetime of a disc arthroplasty device can be 40 or more years, signifi cantly longer than that of a total hip or knee implant, wear and the accumulating wear particulate is of clinical concern, as this is considered a critical determinant of the devices' expected lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regardless of design and material combination, these devices are expected to wear and produce particulate debris over the course of their expected lifetime. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Throughout its over 40-year history, the survivorship of total joint arthroplasty has been limited primarily by the generation of wear debris and its subsequent biologic sequela; aseptic loosening caused by a wear particle-mediated infl ammation and osteolytic cascade. 8,9 Therefore, given that the expected lifetime of a disc arthroplasty device can be 40 or more years, signifi cantly longer than that of a total hip or knee implant, wear and the accumulating wear particulate is of clinical concern, as this is considered a critical determinant of the devices' expected lifetime.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%