1987
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(87)90198-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10Be: Half-life and AMS-standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Calculated according to Dunne et al (1999). Be half-life of 1.51 x 10 6 years (Yiou & Raisbeck 1972;Hofmann et al 1987;Inn et al 1987). ) was used to correct for the background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Calculated according to Dunne et al (1999). Be half-life of 1.51 x 10 6 years (Yiou & Raisbeck 1972;Hofmann et al 1987;Inn et al 1987). ) was used to correct for the background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples with codes ZB7429 to ZB7441 (see Table 1) were measured relative to the standard S555, with a determined 10 Be/ 9 Be ratio of 95.5×10 -12 that was compatible with the old 10 Be half-life of 1.51 Myr (Hofmann et al, 1987). After April 1 st , 2010, the Zuerich AMS lab introduced a new standard, S2007N, with a nominal value of 10 Be/Be = 28.1×10 -12 , that has been calibrated to ICN 01-5-1 (produced by K. Nishiizumi).…”
Section: A1 Details On Analytical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Be was extracted from purified quartz using standard methods (von Blanckenburg et al, 1996;von Blanckenburg et al, 2004), 10 Be/ 9 Be ratios were measured in BeO targets with accelerator mass spectrometry at ETH Zurich relative to the standard S555 with a nominal value of 10 Be/ 9 Be = 95.5 ×10 -12 and corrected as described by Synal et al (1997), which is based on a 10 Be half life of 1.51 Myr (Hofmann et al, 1987). Between 150 and 300 µg of 9 Be carrier was added to each sample, which was determined to contain a 10 Be/ 9 Be ratio of 0.55 ± 0.28×10 -14 , except samples denoted by an asterisk in Table 1 that had a higher blank ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%