2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60526-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

12-h pretreatment with methylprednisolone versus placebo for prevention of postextubation laryngeal oedema: a randomised double-blind trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
175
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
175
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In adults, prophylactic corticosteroids benefit patients deemed to be at high risk for subglottic edema by virtue of low ETT cuff leak volume before extubation (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, prophylactic corticosteroids benefit patients deemed to be at high risk for subglottic edema by virtue of low ETT cuff leak volume before extubation (4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of clinical practice guidelines, summarized in Table 1, has been challenged by contradictory results of clinical trials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] One expert panel recommended corticosteroids for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and for septic shock; 11 however, perceived indications and contraindications for corticosteroid therapy often coexist in critically ill patients. This phenomenon may explain why only half the patients received corticosteroids in recent sepsis and ARDS studies where no protocol was established for their use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6,17,18 Conversely, a lower incidence of post-extubation stridor and need for re-intubation has been shown in trials where higher risk patients were identified and where corticosteroids were initiated > six hours prior to planned extubation, and administered in multiple doses. 4,16,19 Accordingly, François et al 20 performed a large, well-designed randomized trial that significantly extends upon the experience from prior investigations. This work provides compelling evidence of benefit with the use of prophylactic corticosteroids in the prevention of post-extubation laryngeal edema, along with a reduced need for re-intubation attributable to major obstruction.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many investigators have dismissed the risk of these adverse effects as being negligible, but have also been inconsistent in reporting them. 6,19,20 Therefore, the optimal intervention (i.e., corticosteroid drug, dose, schedule) that reduces the occurrence of post-extubation laryngeal edema, while also minimizing the potential for adverse effects, remains controversial.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%